Ann Li vs Jil Teichmann — Merida Quarter-final

Merida · WTA · Quarter-final
Ann Li
USA
Ann Li
#29WTA
1817ELO
1751Hard ELO
$696kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2024
hard
Jil Teichmann
SUI
Jil Teichmann
#130WTA
1692ELO
1633Hard ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
Li A.
6-1 6-1
Teichmann J.
Li A.
662
Teichmann J.
110

Ann Li defeated Jil Teichmann 6-1 6-1 in the Merida quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Ann Li came in ranked #29.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Li A.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Teichmann J.

Teichmann J.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Li A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Li A.Teichmann J.
47
Serve
—
48
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Li A.Teichmann J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
58%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
2.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (114 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Li A.Teichmann J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
76
52
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
71
Break points won·Even
87
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
58
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Li A.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Teichmann J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.9+118 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.1Hard Elo 1633
7.3Overall Elo 1817
ELO gap
2.7Overall Elo 1692
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
4.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Li A.Teichmann J.
Freshness·Slight edge
55
61

Li A.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 87 games (7d) · Teichmann J.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 75 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
28°CDrizzle
Wind 14 km/hHumidity 71%

Draw

Final
Sonmez Z.
Li A.
6-26-1
Semi-finals
Sonmez Z.
Korneeva A.
7-656-2
Li A.
Kudermetova P.
6-34-66-2
Quarter-finals
Sonmez Z.
Zarazua R.[1]
3-66-36-4
Korneeva A.
Sorribes Tormo S.
6-36-1
Li A.
Teichmann J.
6-16-1
Kudermetova P.
Stojanovic N.
5-76-46-3
R16
Teichmann J.
Tomljanovic A.[3]
W/O
Sonmez Z.
Jacquemot E.
7-636-3
Sorribes Tormo S.
Stefanini L.
6-41-66-4
Li A.
Ruzic A.
6-26-2
Korneeva A.
Blinkova A.[5]
7-56-2
Kudermetova P.
Lepchenko V.
6-36-4
Zarazua R.[1]
Chwalinska M.
2-66-26-1
Stojanovic N.
Stakusic M.
6-36-3
R32
Sorribes Tormo S.
Sanchez A.
6-26-1
Korneeva A.
Parks A.
6-36-1
Li A.
Parrizas Diaz N.[8]
6-06-4
Blinkova A.[5]
Tsurenko L.
2-66-44-0
Stefanini L.
Niemeier J.[4]
6-36-2
Zarazua R.[1]
Urhobo A.
7-56-2
Teichmann J.
Tikhonova A.
6-16-4
Tomljanovic A.[3]
Mandlik E.
7-696-1
Chwalinska M.
Marino R.
4-66-46-3
Ruzic A.
Samson L.
6-46-4
Stakusic M.
Joint M.
2-67-627-62
Lepchenko V.
Zidansek T.
6-26-2
Kudermetova P.
Podoroska N.[2]
6-16-1
Sonmez Z.
Carle M.[6]
5-76-16-2
Jacquemot E.
Montgomery R.
4-66-37-64
Stojanovic N.
Maria T.[7]
6-46-4