Thanasi Kokkinakis vs Christian Langmo — Sydney CH Round of 32

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Thanasi Kokkinakis
AUS2
Thanasi Kokkinakis
#460ATP
30 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2024
hard
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLW
Kokkinakis T.
6-3 6-4
Langmo C.
Kokkinakis T.
662
Langmo C.
340

Thanasi Kokkinakis defeated Christian Langmo 6-3 6-4 in the Sydney CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Thanasi Kokkinakis came in ranked #460, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kokkinakis T.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kokkinakis T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kokkinakis T.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
65%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.8
7.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (62 vs 110). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kokkinakis T.Langmo C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
23
Break points saved·Slight edge
99
88
Break points won·Clear edge
15
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
26
Tiebreaks·Dominant
94
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kokkinakis T.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 38 days (−0.7)
Langmo C.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.8
Surface form
4.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kokkinakis T.Langmo C.
Freshness·Dominant
95
65

Kokkinakis T.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kokkinakis T.[2]
Hijikata R.[1]
6-16-1
Semi-finals
Hijikata R.[1]
Shimizu Y.[8]
7-616-3
Kokkinakis T.[2]
Schoolkate T.[3]
6-47-63
Quarter-finals
Hijikata R.[1]
Hudd E.
6-36-1
Shimizu Y.[8]
Rai A.
6-16-4
Schoolkate T.[3]
Jasika O.[5]
6-26-757-67
Kokkinakis T.[2]
Shiraishi H.
6-26-1
R16
Hijikata R.[1]
Imamura M.
6-37-63
Hudd E.
Dellavedova M.
6-727-56-2
Rai A.
Mochizuki Y.
7-622-67-63
Shimizu Y.[8]
Mott B.
6-15-76-3
Jasika O.[5]
Ellis B.
7-56-1
Schoolkate T.[3]
Colson T.
6-26-3
Shiraishi H.
Polmans M.[6]
3-66-16-2
Kokkinakis T.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-27-64
R32
Jasika O.[5]
Kumasaka T.
6-25-77-5
Sekulic P.
Marinkov P.
6-25-76-1
Hijikata R.[1]
Matsuda R.
7-656-756-4
Imamura M.
Jones H.
6-37-63
Hudd E.
Sweeny D.
6-26-2
Dellavedova M.
Mochizuki S.[7]
6-16-2
Rai A.
Bolt A.[4]
7-57-5
Mochizuki Y.
Bakshi A.
6-46-2
Mott B.
Watanabe S.
7-56-756-3
Shimizu Y.[8]
Bradshaw J.
6-36-3
Ellis B.
Mccabe J.
6-727-56-3
Colson T.
Imai S.
6-33-66-2
Schoolkate T.[3]
Delaney J.
7-646-3
Polmans M.[6]
Winter E.
6-26-2
Shiraishi H.
Bouzige M.
6-26-4
Kokkinakis T.[2]
Langmo C.
6-36-4