James Trotter vs Brandon Holt — Charlottesville CH Round of 16

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
JPN
James Trotter
#432ATP
1414ELO
1380Hard ELO
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2024
hard
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Trotter J.
6-2 6-3
Holt B.
Trotter J.
662
Holt B.
230

James Trotter defeated Brandon Holt 6-2 6-3 in the Charlottesville CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — James Trotter came in ranked #432, leading the head-to-head 1–0. James Trotter extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-05-26Roland GarrosQ1clayJames Trotter6-1 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Trotter J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Trotter J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Trotter J.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
4.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
0.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (134 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Trotter J.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
40
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
85
Break points won·Dominant
2
31
Deciding sets·Even
81
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Trotter J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Holt B.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.4Hard Elo 1380
Surface ELO
6.6+127 Hard Elo edge
3.5Overall Elo 1414
ELO gap
6.5Overall Elo 1537
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.7
Surface form
6.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
7.2
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Trotter J.Holt B.
Freshness·
75
—

Trotter J.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Trotter J.
Basavareddy N.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.
Galarneau A.
6-46-2
Trotter J.
Tien L.[2]
6-33-66-2
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Rodesch C.
6-46-767-65
Galarneau A.
Quinn E.
6-36-2
Trotter J.
Smith C.
7-642-67-64
Tien L.[2]
Lajal M.
3-66-16-4
R16
Basavareddy N.
Zahraj P.
6-26-0
Rodesch C.
Jubb P.[8]
6-777-56-4
Galarneau A.
Dietrich D.
6-27-65
Quinn E.
Kasnikowski M.[5]
7-56-0
Smith C.
Opelka R.
6-756-46-4
Trotter J.
Holt B.
6-26-3
Lajal M.
Kypson P.[6]
7-646-3
Tien L.[2]
Mejia N.
6-47-68
R32
Kasnikowski M.[5]
Edmund K.
4-66-46-2
Zahraj P.
Eubanks C.[1]
6-17-67
Basavareddy N.
Spizzirri E.
6-46-3
Rodesch C.
Nanda G.
6-46-3
Jubb P.[8]
Kodat T.
6-46-2
Dietrich D.
Svajda Z.[4]
6-36-3
Galarneau A.
Nakagawa N.
6-46-1
Quinn E.
Couacaud E.
6-17-67
Opelka R.
Popko D.[7]
5-76-17-61
Smith C.
Ilagan A.
6-37-5
Holt B.
Rybakov A.
7-56-4
Trotter J.
Krueger M.[3]
7-57-66
Kypson P.[6]
Tomic B.
6-36-0
Lajal M.
Searle H.
6-36-3
Mejia N.
Kudla D.
0-66-37-5
Tien L.[2]
Zhukayev B.
2-66-46-2