Patrick Zahraj vs Christopher Eubanks — Charlottesville CH Round of 32

Charlottesville CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Patrick Zahraj
#425ATP
1331ELO
1322Hard ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2024
hard
USA1
Christopher Eubanks
#788ATP
1523ELO
1493Hard ELO
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
Zahraj P.
6-1 7-6
Eubanks C.
Zahraj P.
6792
Eubanks C.
1670

Patrick Zahraj defeated Christopher Eubanks 6-1 7-6 in the Charlottesville CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Patrick Zahraj came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zahraj P.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Eubanks C.

Eubanks C.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Zahraj P.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zahraj P.Eubanks C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
32%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.8
10.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (105 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zahraj P.Eubanks C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
20
50
Break points saved·Dominant
69
96
Break points won·Slight edge
10
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
7
67
Tiebreaks·Even
77
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zahraj P.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Eubanks C.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.5Hard Elo 1322
Surface ELO
6.5+171 Hard Elo edge
3.2Overall Elo 1331
ELO gap
6.8Overall Elo 1523
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
7.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
6.6
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zahraj P.Eubanks C.
Freshness·
80
—

Zahraj P.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 53 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Trotter J.
Basavareddy N.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.
Galarneau A.
6-46-2
Trotter J.
Tien L.[2]
6-33-66-2
Quarter-finals
Basavareddy N.
Rodesch C.
6-46-767-65
Galarneau A.
Quinn E.
6-36-2
Trotter J.
Smith C.
7-642-67-64
Tien L.[2]
Lajal M.
3-66-16-4
R16
Basavareddy N.
Zahraj P.
6-26-0
Rodesch C.
Jubb P.[8]
6-777-56-4
Galarneau A.
Dietrich D.
6-27-65
Quinn E.
Kasnikowski M.[5]
7-56-0
Smith C.
Opelka R.
6-756-46-4
Trotter J.
Holt B.
6-26-3
Lajal M.
Kypson P.[6]
7-646-3
Tien L.[2]
Mejia N.
6-47-68
R32
Kasnikowski M.[5]
Edmund K.
4-66-46-2
Zahraj P.
Eubanks C.[1]
6-17-67
Basavareddy N.
Spizzirri E.
6-46-3
Rodesch C.
Nanda G.
6-46-3
Jubb P.[8]
Kodat T.
6-46-2
Dietrich D.
Svajda Z.[4]
6-36-3
Galarneau A.
Nakagawa N.
6-46-1
Quinn E.
Couacaud E.
6-17-67
Opelka R.
Popko D.[7]
5-76-17-61
Smith C.
Ilagan A.
6-37-5
Holt B.
Rybakov A.
7-56-4
Trotter J.
Krueger M.[3]
7-57-66
Kypson P.[6]
Tomic B.
6-36-0
Lajal M.
Searle H.
6-36-3
Mejia N.
Kudla D.
0-66-37-5
Tien L.[2]
Zhukayev B.
2-66-46-2