Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Zhizhen Zhang — Paris Masters Round of 64

Paris Masters · ATP · Round of 64
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
ARG
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
#32ATP
1812ELO
1766Hard ELO
$1.4MYTD
$6.8MCAREER
26 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2024
hard
Zhizhen Zhang
CHN
Zhizhen Zhang
#161ATP
1682ELO
1642Hard ELO
$546kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWLWW
Etcheverry T.
6-3 7-6
Zhang Z.
Etcheverry T.
6782
Zhang Z.
3660

Tomas Martin Etcheverry defeated Zhizhen Zhang 6-3 7-6 in the Paris Masters round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Martin Etcheverry came in ranked #32, defending last year's round of 32. Tomas Martin Etcheverry claimed a first win over Zhizhen Zhang in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-10-02Shanghai MastersR64hardZhizhen Zhang4-6 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Etcheverry T.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Zhang Z.

Zhang Z.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Etcheverry T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Etcheverry T.Zhang Z.
51
Serve
24
35
Return
0

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Etcheverry T.Zhang Z.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
36%
33%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.6
7.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (149 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Etcheverry T.Zhang Z.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
70
56
Break points saved·Even
98
94
Break points won·Clear edge
36
14
Deciding sets·Slight edge
84
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Etcheverry T.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Zhang Z.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+124 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Hard Elo 1642
7.0Overall Elo 1812
ELO gap
3.0Overall Elo 1682
0.0
H2H
10.0
3.8
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
8.1
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Etcheverry T.Zhang Z.
Freshness·Slight edge
94
100

Etcheverry T.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Zhang Z.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
14°COvercast
Wind 5 km/hHumidity 92%
Final
Zverev A.[3]
Humbert U.[15]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Humbert U.[15]
Khachanov K.
6-766-46-3
Zverev A.[3]
Rune H.[13]
6-37-64
Quarter-finals
Rune H.[13]
De Minaur A.[9]
6-44-67-5
Khachanov K.
Dimitrov G.[8]
6-26-3
Zverev A.[3]
Tsitsipas S.[10]
7-56-4
Humbert U.[15]
Thompson J.
6-27-64
R16
Humbert U.[15]
Alcaraz C.[2]
6-13-67-5
Rune H.[13]
Cazaux A.
3-66-36-4
De Minaur A.[9]
Draper J.
5-76-26-3
Zverev A.[3]
Fils A.
6-43-66-3
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Cerundolo F.
6-716-46-2
Dimitrov G.[8]
Rinderknech A.
6-24-67-65
Khachanov K.
Popyrin A.
7-656-4
Thompson J.
Mannarino A.
7-57-65
R32
Fils A.
Struff J.
6-36-4
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Tabilo A.
6-36-4
Thompson J.
Ruud C.[7]
7-633-66-4
Rinderknech A.
Michelsen A.
7-667-67
Draper J.
Fritz T.[5]
7-664-66-4
Zverev A.[3]
Griekspoor T.
7-626-3
Cerundolo F.
Rublev A.[6]
7-667-65
Dimitrov G.[8]
Etcheverry T.
6-796-37-5
Khachanov K.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
6-7126-16-4
De Minaur A.[9]
Kecmanovic M.
6-47-65
Mannarino A.
Bergs Z.
3-66-26-4
Humbert U.[15]
Giron M.
6-36-2
Alcaraz C.[2]
Jarry N.
7-56-1
Popyrin A.
Medvedev D.[4]
6-42-67-64
Cazaux A.
Shelton B.
6-37-64
Rune H.[13]
Bublik A.
6-46-2
R64
De Minaur A.[9]
Navone M.
7-56-1
Struff J.
Musetti L.[16]
6-46-2
Etcheverry T.
Zhang Z.
6-37-66
Khachanov K.
Oconnell C.
6-43-67-66
Giron M.
Shang J.
7-667-66
Rinderknech A.
Machac T.
6-735-3
Michelsen A.
Hurkacz H.[12]
6-16-3
Tabilo A.
Borges N.
3-67-656-3
Draper J.
Lehecka J.
7-56-2
Fils A.
Cilic M.
7-656-4
Kecmanovic M.
Baez S.
6-46-767-5
Griekspoor T.
Darderi L.
6-36-4
Bublik A.
Fognini F.
7-57-5
Rune H.[13]
Arnaldi M.
6-46-4
Thompson J.
Martinez P.
6-46-4
Bergs Z.
Gasquet R.
6-36-4
Mannarino A.
Paul T.[11]
6-37-5
Humbert U.[15]
Nakashima B.
6-34-66-4
Jarry N.
Sonego L.
7-646-3
Mpetshi Perricard G.
Tiafoe F.[14]
6-757-646-3
Cerundolo F.
Halys Q.
7-656-3
Shelton B.
Moutet C.
6-36-786-3
Tsitsipas S.[10]
Carballes Baena R.
4-66-36-3
Popyrin A.
Berrettini M.
7-57-62