Antoine Escoffier vs Li Tu — Seoul CH Quarter-final

Seoul CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
FRA
Antoine Escoffier
#753ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2024
hard
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Escoffier A.
6-0 6-4
Tu L.
Escoffier A.
662
Tu L.
040

Antoine Escoffier defeated Li Tu 6-0 6-4 in the Seoul CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Li Tu came in ranked #464, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Escoffier A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Escoffier A.Tu L.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
6.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (93 vs 124). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Escoffier A.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
10
27
Break points saved·Clear edge
68
82
Break points won·Slight edge
18
8
Deciding sets·Slight edge
12
20
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Escoffier A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Tu L.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.0Hard Elo 1413
Surface ELO
6.0+58 Hard Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1436
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1488
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.2
Surface form
6.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
7.9
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Basilashvili N.
Daniel T.[1]
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Basilashvili N.
Escoffier A.
W/O
Daniel T.[1]
Rodionov J.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Daniel T.[1]
Samrej K.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
6-736-36-4
Escoffier A.
Tu L.
6-06-4
Basilashvili N.
Moriya H.
6-36-4
R16
Rodionov J.
Shimabukuro S.[8]
7-637-62
Daniel T.[1]
Svrcina D.
6-16-4
Samrej K.
Wong C.[6]
6-717-56-4
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Blockx A.
7-676-1
Escoffier A.
Uesugi K.
6-47-61
Tu L.
Chung H.
4-66-36-1
Basilashvili N.
Wu T.
6-26-736-4
Moriya H.
Mcdonald M.[2]
6-30-66-4
R32
Daniel T.[1]
Paire B.
7-644-67-5
Moriya H.
Den Ouden G.
5-76-46-4
Samrej K.
Ocleppo J.
6-16-4
Wong C.[6]
Bai Y.
6-33-66-3
Mcdonald M.[2]
Cui J.
6-36-0
Svrcina D.
Sin S.
6-36-0
Moreno De Alboran N.[3]
Ymer E.
7-646-756-4
Blockx A.
Hsu Y.
6-27-5
Rodionov J.
Uchida K.
6-47-69
Shimabukuro S.[8]
Janvier M.
6-26-4
Escoffier A.
Zhou Y.
6-43-66-1
Uesugi K.
Ramanathan R.
6-46-4
Chung H.
Chung Y.
7-56-3
Tu L.
Tseng C.[4]
6-26-1
Basilashvili N.
Atmane T.[7]
6-33-66-4
Wu T.
Noguchi R.
6-46-4