Omar Jasika vs Blake Ellis — Sydney CH Round of 16

Sydney CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS5
Omar Jasika
#528ATP
1296ELO
1272Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 October 2024
hard
AUS
Blake Ellis
#472ATP
1416ELO
1390Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
Jasika O.
7-5 6-1
Ellis B.
Jasika O.
762
Ellis B.
510

Omar Jasika defeated Blake Ellis 7-5 6-1 in the Sydney CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Blake Ellis came in ranked #472, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Omar Jasika came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jasika O.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ellis B.

Ellis B.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Jasika O.

Serve advantage — Ellis B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jasika O.Ellis B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.2
8.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (110 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jasika O.Ellis B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
41
Break points saved·Dominant
47
79
Break points won·Slight edge
13
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
1
38

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jasika O.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Ellis B.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.2Hard Elo 1272
Surface ELO
6.8+119 Hard Elo edge
3.2Overall Elo 1296
ELO gap
6.8Overall Elo 1416
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.6
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
9.1
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jasika O.Ellis B.
Freshness·
—
90

Ellis B.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kokkinakis T.[2]
Hijikata R.[1]
6-16-1
Semi-finals
Hijikata R.[1]
Shimizu Y.[8]
7-616-3
Kokkinakis T.[2]
Schoolkate T.[3]
6-47-63
Quarter-finals
Hijikata R.[1]
Hudd E.
6-36-1
Shimizu Y.[8]
Rai A.
6-16-4
Schoolkate T.[3]
Jasika O.[5]
6-26-757-67
Kokkinakis T.[2]
Shiraishi H.
6-26-1
R16
Hijikata R.[1]
Imamura M.
6-37-63
Hudd E.
Dellavedova M.
6-727-56-2
Rai A.
Mochizuki Y.
7-622-67-63
Shimizu Y.[8]
Mott B.
6-15-76-3
Jasika O.[5]
Ellis B.
7-56-1
Schoolkate T.[3]
Colson T.
6-26-3
Shiraishi H.
Polmans M.[6]
3-66-16-2
Kokkinakis T.[2]
Sekulic P.
6-27-64
R32
Jasika O.[5]
Kumasaka T.
6-25-77-5
Sekulic P.
Marinkov P.
6-25-76-1
Hijikata R.[1]
Matsuda R.
7-656-756-4
Imamura M.
Jones H.
6-37-63
Hudd E.
Sweeny D.
6-26-2
Dellavedova M.
Mochizuki S.[7]
6-16-2
Rai A.
Bolt A.[4]
7-57-5
Mochizuki Y.
Bakshi A.
6-46-2
Mott B.
Watanabe S.
7-56-756-3
Shimizu Y.[8]
Bradshaw J.
6-36-3
Ellis B.
Mccabe J.
6-727-56-3
Colson T.
Imai S.
6-33-66-2
Schoolkate T.[3]
Delaney J.
7-646-3
Polmans M.[6]
Winter E.
6-26-2
Shiraishi H.
Bouzige M.
6-26-4
Kokkinakis T.[2]
Langmo C.
6-36-4