Jose Rubin Statham vs Finn Reynolds — Taipei 2 CH Qualifying Round 1

Taipei 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
NZL9
Jose Rubin Statham
39 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2024
hard
NZL
Finn Reynolds
26 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLL
Statham J.
6-3 6-3
Reynolds F.
Statham J.
662
Reynolds F.
330

Jose Rubin Statham defeated Finn Reynolds 6-3 6-3 in the Taipei 2 CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Statham J.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Reynolds F.

Reynolds F.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Statham J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Statham J.Reynolds F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
39%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
33%
31%
Break points saved·Slight edge
53%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.4
7.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 4). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Statham J.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Reynolds F.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 154 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Uesugi K.
Sim S.[11]
6-26-2
Takahashi Y.[2]
Meng C.[12]
6-46-4
Chanta T.[7]
Stalder R.
7-644-66-3
Sin S.[4]
Statham J.[9]
6-43-66-1
Lee K.
Weber A.[5]
6-36-3
Leong M.[6]
King E.
4-66-36-4
Q1
Uesugi K.
Kirkin E.[1]
6-36-3
Sim S.[11]
Ganta S.
6-34-67-65
Takahashi Y.[2]
Takamisawa T.
6-06-3
Meng C.[12]
Wang K.
7-626-4
Stalder R.
Nam J.[3]
7-57-5
Chanta T.[7]
De Cuyper J.
6-34-66-3
Sin S.[4]
Fu H.
6-26-2
Statham J.[9]
Reynolds F.
6-36-3
Weber A.[5]
Hsieh C.
6-46-3
Lee K.
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.[8]
6-16-4
Leong M.[6]
Hou C.
6-16-2
King E.
Yin B.[10]
6-43-66-2