Dane Sweeny vs Blake Ellis — Playford CH Round of 32

Playford CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2024
hard
AUS
Blake Ellis
#472ATP
1416ELO
1390Hard ELO
27 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
Sweeny D.
6-2 7-5
Ellis B.
Sweeny D.
672
Ellis B.
250

Dane Sweeny defeated Blake Ellis 6-2 7-5 in the Playford CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Dane Sweeny came in ranked #122, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Dane Sweeny closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sweeny D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ellis B.

Ellis B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sweeny D.Ellis B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.6
8.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sweeny D.Ellis B.
Clutch Rating·Even
45
41
Break points saved·Slight edge
69
79
Break points won·Slight edge
11
3
Deciding sets·Slight edge
68
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
37

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sweeny D.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Ellis B.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 27 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.8+53 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Hard Elo 1390
5.8Overall Elo 1460
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1416
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.6
Surface form
6.0
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sweeny D.Ellis B.
Freshness·Slight edge
98
92

Sweeny D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Ellis B.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Hijikata R.[1]
Shimizu Y.
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Hijikata R.[1]
Imamura M.
5-76-46-4
Shimizu Y.
Polmans M.[8]
6-06-3
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.[8]
Mochizuki S.[3]
2-66-46-4
Hijikata R.[1]
Jasika O.[7]
5-77-646-3
Imamura M.
Schoolkate T.[4]
6-43-67-5
Shimizu Y.
Tu L.[6]
6-46-2
R16
Hijikata R.[1]
Sweeny D.
6-46-3
Jasika O.[7]
Langmo C.
6-36-3
Schoolkate T.[4]
Bouzige M.
6-16-2
Imamura M.
Fancutt T.
6-36-1
Polmans M.[8]
Imai S.
7-673-66-2
Mochizuki S.[3]
Matsuda R.
6-46-2
Tu L.[6]
Sekulic P.
6-46-2
Shimizu Y.
Mochizuki Y.
7-686-2
R32
Hijikata R.[1]
Hudd E.
7-647-62
Jasika O.[7]
Kumasaka T.
7-56-2
Mochizuki Y.
Shiraishi H.
6-46-4
Shimizu Y.
Mott B.
6-37-5
Bouzige M.
Bradshaw J.
4-67-56-3
Sweeny D.
Ellis B.
6-27-5
Langmo C.
Marinkov P.
6-34-66-3
Schoolkate T.[4]
Delaney J.
6-46-3
Imamura M.
Sinclair C.
7-646-3
Fancutt T.
Winter E.
7-57-62
Polmans M.[8]
Tkemaladze Z.
2-66-46-4
Imai S.
Ichikawa T.
6-16-4
Matsuda R.
Rai A.
3-66-26-2
Mochizuki S.[3]
Bakshi A.
7-56-3
Tu L.[6]
Purtseladze S.
6-16-3
Sekulic P.
Colson T.
6-36-2