Luca Van Assche vs Emilio Nava — Brest CH Round of 32

Brest CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Luca Van Assche
FRA
Luca Van Assche
#86ATP
1701ELO
1681Hard ELO
$411kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
22 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2024
hard
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1621Hard ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Van Assche L.
6-3 7-5
Nava E.
Van Assche L.
672
Nava E.
350

Luca Van Assche defeated Emilio Nava 6-3 7-5 in the Brest CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Luca Van Assche came in ranked #86.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Assche L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Van Assche L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Van Assche L.Nava E.
—
Serve
40
—
Return
16

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van Assche L.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
64%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.3
7.7
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (168 vs 189). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Assche L.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
68
52
Break points saved·Even
91
94
Break points won·Dominant
61
17
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
89
Tiebreaks·Dominant
51
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Assche L.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Nava E.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8+60 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Hard Elo 1621
5.1Overall Elo 1701
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
4.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.9
Minutes 14d
6.2
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van Assche L.Nava E.
Freshness·Clear edge
77
100

Van Assche L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d) · Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Virtanen O.[8]
Bonzi B.
6-44-67-66
Semi-finals
Bonzi B.
Kachmazov A.
6-757-637-64
Virtanen O.[8]
Hassan B.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Hassan B.
Paul J.
6-46-3
Virtanen O.[8]
Van Assche L.
7-616-4
Bonzi B.
Fonseca J.
6-46-786-4
Kachmazov A.
Kukushkin M.[6]
6-36-2
R16
Bonzi B.
Herbert P.
5-77-646-3
Fonseca J.
Harris B.[5]
6-46-2
Kachmazov A.
Piros Z.
3-66-46-1
Kukushkin M.[6]
Barrere G.
6-16-3
Hassan B.
Landaluce M.
6-26-726-2
Paul J.
Grenier H.
6-46-2
Virtanen O.[8]
Martineau M.
6-36-2
Van Assche L.
Dzumhur D.[2]
7-57-5
R32
Grenier H.
Collignon R.
6-46-4
Bonzi B.
Hemery C.
7-56-3
Herbert P.
Rehberg M.
5-76-36-3
Fonseca J.
Majchrzak K.
6-47-5
Harris B.[5]
Gautier A.
6-26-3
Kachmazov A.
Mayot H.[3]
2-66-37-63
Piros Z.
Droguet T.
6-47-69
Barrere G.
Taberner C.
7-646-2
Kukushkin M.[6]
Butvilas E.
6-44-67-63
Landaluce M.
Djere L.[7]
7-656-4
Hassan B.
Andreev A.
7-54-66-4
Paul J.
Guinard M.
6-36-4
Virtanen O.[8]
Gea A.
3-67-56-3
Martineau M.
Vatutin A.
6-04-67-5
Van Assche L.
Nava E.
6-37-5
Dzumhur D.[2]
Shelbayh A.
6-16-1