Beibit Zhukayev vs Tomas Machac — Almaty Round of 16

Almaty · ATP · Round of 16
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#316ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 14 October 2024
hard
Tomas Machac
CZE5
Tomas Machac
#49ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Zhukayev B.
3-1
Machac T.
Zhukayev B.
3–
Machac T.
1–

Beibit Zhukayev advanced when Tomas Machac retired 3-1 in the Almaty round of 16.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhukayev B.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Machac T.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Zhukayev B.Machac T.
—
Serve
30
—
Return
25

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Zhukayev B.Machac T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
33%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.3
5.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 121). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhukayev B.Machac T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
30
90
Break points saved·Even
94
98
Break points won·Dominant
1
80
Deciding sets·Dominant
24
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
63
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhukayev B.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Machac T.
8.2
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.0Hard Elo 1402
Surface ELO
10.0+428 Hard Elo edge
0.1Overall Elo 1455
ELO gap
9.9Overall Elo 1866
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
7.7
Win streak
7.04-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
4.5
7.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Khachanov K.[3]
Diallo G.
6-25-76-3
Semi-finals
Khachanov K.[3]
Vukic A.
6-736-36-4
Diallo G.
Cerundolo F.[4]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Cerundolo F.[4]
Shevchenko A.
6-26-3
Vukic A.
Tiafoe F.[1]
6-27-611
Khachanov K.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-26-4
Diallo G.
Tabilo A.[2]
3-66-36-4
R16
Khachanov K.[3]
Virtanen O.
7-627-63
Zhukayev B.
Machac T.[5]
3-1
Cerundolo F.[4]
Engel J.
6-47-63
Tiafoe F.[1]
Evans D.
6-7107-646-3
Vukic A.
Mannarino A.[8]
7-646-3
Shevchenko A.
Karatsev A.
6-16-757-5
Diallo G.
Coric B.
7-616-4
Tabilo A.[2]
Marterer M.
6-26-4
R32
Shevchenko A.
Kukushkin M.
7-657-64
Diallo G.
Oconnell C.
7-656-2
Marterer M.
Dzumhur D.
7-56-4
Evans D.
Daniel T.
6-27-64
Vukic A.
Duckworth J.
6-47-5
Mannarino A.[8]
Safiullin R.
5-77-646-3
Virtanen O.
Fognini F.
6-37-64
Zhukayev B.
Hassan B.
6-46-1
Machac T.[5]
Skatov T.
6-36-4
Karatsev A.
Zhang Z.[6]
6-47-62
Engel J.
Wong C.
7-56-4
Coric B.
Marozsan F.[7]
6-47-64