Matteo Gigante vs Javier Barranco Cosano — Olbia CH Quarter-final

Olbia CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Matteo Gigante
ITA7
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1534Hard ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 14 October 2024
hard
ESP
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1399Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
Gigante M.
7-6 5-7 6-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Gigante M.
79562
Barranco Cosano J.
67731

Matteo Gigante defeated Javier Barranco Cosano 7-6 5-7 6-3 in the Olbia CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Matteo Gigante closed it out in three sets, 7–6 5–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gigante M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Barranco Cosano J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Serve advantage — Gigante M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gigante M.Barranco Cosano J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.0
2.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (109 vs 106). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gigante M.Barranco Cosano J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
14
Break points saved·Slight edge
78
70
Break points won·Even
35
33
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
54
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gigante M.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Barranco Cosano J.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.7+135 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Hard Elo 1399
6.7Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1457
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
7.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
4.6
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Landaluce M.
Bellucci M.[2]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Landaluce M.
Gigante M.[7]
6-16-3
Bellucci M.[2]
Svrcina D.
7-653-66-3
Quarter-finals
Gigante M.[7]
Barranco Cosano J.
7-675-76-3
Landaluce M.
Vavassori A.
2-66-16-2
Svrcina D.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
3-66-06-4
Bellucci M.[2]
Lestienne C.[6]
7-626-757-5
R16
Barranco Cosano J.
Nava E.
6-46-3
Gigante M.[7]
Lokoli L.
6-16-1
Landaluce M.
Travaglia S.
6-47-66
Vavassori A.
Merida Aguilar D.
6-47-61
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Trungelliti M.[5]
6-47-64
Svrcina D.
Ajdukovic D.[4]
6-17-5
Lestienne C.[6]
Bertola R.
6-26-2
Bellucci M.[2]
Barton H.
6-36-2
R32
Barranco Cosano J.
Nardi L.[1]
7-54-1
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Poljicak M.
3-2
Gigante M.[7]
Molleker R.
6-26-2
Nava E.
Krutykh O.
5-76-37-5
Lokoli L.
Diez S.
4-66-36-0
Landaluce M.
Mayot H.[3]
6-16-2
Travaglia S.
Berrettini J.
7-56-0
Merida Aguilar D.
Dalla Valle E.
6-46-3
Vavassori A.
Choinski J.[8]
6-46-0
Trungelliti M.[5]
Taberner C.
3-66-37-5
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Paire B.
6-36-2
Svrcina D.
Arnaboldi F.
6-06-0
Lestienne C.[6]
Fomin S.
6-06-3
Bertola R.
Cina F.
6-46-737-5
Barton H.
Novak D.
6-13-67-5
Bellucci M.[2]
Janvier M.
6-36-4