Bernard Tomic vs Max Wiskandt — Fairfield CH Round of 32

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernard Tomic
AUS7
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 October 2024
hard
Max Wiskandt
GER
Max Wiskandt
#458ATP
1263ELO
1226Hard ELO
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
Tomic B.
7-6 7-6
Wiskandt M.
Tomic B.
78772
Wiskandt M.
66650

Bernard Tomic defeated Max Wiskandt 7-6 7-6 in the Fairfield CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Bernard Tomic came in ranked #206, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wiskandt M.

Wiskandt M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Wiskandt M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.6
4.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Wiskandt M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
53
9
Break points saved·Dominant
92
36
Break points won·Clear edge
4
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
34

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Wiskandt M.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
8.0+215 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.0Hard Elo 1226
8.0Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
2.0Overall Elo 1263
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
6.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Wiskandt M.
Freshness·
84
—

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Tien L.[1]
Tomic B.[7]
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Tien L.[1]
Holt B.[6]
6-05-76-4
Tomic B.[7]
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Tien L.[1]
Kypson P.[5]
1-66-36-0
Holt B.[6]
Popko D.[4]
6-26-4
Tomic B.[7]
Galarneau A.
7-661-67-66
Schoolkate T.[2]
Quinn E.[8]
6-06-737-63
R16
Galarneau A.
Pannu K.
6-46-1
Tien L.[1]
Kodat T.
7-56-4
Kypson P.[5]
Butvilas E.
6-36-4
Popko D.[4]
Seggerman R.
7-56-1
Holt B.[6]
Spizzirri E.
7-57-5
Tomic B.[7]
Basing M.
4-67-616-1
Quinn E.[8]
Quan R.
6-32-66-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Zakharov A.
6-36-4
R32
Tomic B.[7]
Wiskandt M.
7-667-65
Spizzirri E.
Hilderbrand T.
6-33-1
Seggerman R.
Boitan G.
7-57-5
Galarneau A.
Wolf J.[3]
7-626-4
Tien L.[1]
Oliveira G.
6-26-2
Kodat T.
Mejia N.
6-42-66-2
Butvilas E.
Bertola R.
6-36-2
Kypson P.[5]
Artnak B.
6-16-3
Popko D.[4]
Mayo A.
6-33-66-4
Holt B.[6]
Cassone M.
7-657-5
Basing M.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-21-66-3
Pannu K.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-16-4
Quinn E.[8]
Overbeck C.
6-36-0
Quan R.
Den Ouden G.
3-66-36-4
Zakharov A.
Braswell M.
6-36-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Kuzuhara B.
6-36-4