Learner Tien vs Bernard Tomic — Fairfield CH Final

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Learner Tien
USA1
Learner Tien
#15ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 October 2024
hard
Bernard Tomic
AUS7
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Tien L.
6-0 6-1
Tomic B.
Tien L.
662
Tomic B.
010

Learner Tien defeated Bernard Tomic 6-0 6-1 in the Fairfield CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Learner Tien came in ranked #15, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tien L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tien L.Tomic B.
32
Serve
—
67
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tien L.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
63%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
5.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (142 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tien L.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
53
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
92
Break points won·Dominant
83
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
74
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
100
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tien L.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Tomic B.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+463 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Hard Elo 1441
9.9Overall Elo 1941
ELO gap
0.1Overall Elo 1475
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.6
Surface form
4.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.4
Minutes 14d
5.8
4.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tien L.Tomic B.
Freshness·Slight edge
95
84

Tien L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Tien L.[1]
Tomic B.[7]
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Tien L.[1]
Holt B.[6]
6-05-76-4
Tomic B.[7]
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Tien L.[1]
Kypson P.[5]
1-66-36-0
Holt B.[6]
Popko D.[4]
6-26-4
Tomic B.[7]
Galarneau A.
7-661-67-66
Schoolkate T.[2]
Quinn E.[8]
6-06-737-63
R16
Galarneau A.
Pannu K.
6-46-1
Tien L.[1]
Kodat T.
7-56-4
Kypson P.[5]
Butvilas E.
6-36-4
Popko D.[4]
Seggerman R.
7-56-1
Holt B.[6]
Spizzirri E.
7-57-5
Tomic B.[7]
Basing M.
4-67-616-1
Quinn E.[8]
Quan R.
6-32-66-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Zakharov A.
6-36-4
R32
Tomic B.[7]
Wiskandt M.
7-667-65
Spizzirri E.
Hilderbrand T.
6-33-1
Seggerman R.
Boitan G.
7-57-5
Galarneau A.
Wolf J.[3]
7-626-4
Tien L.[1]
Oliveira G.
6-26-2
Kodat T.
Mejia N.
6-42-66-2
Butvilas E.
Bertola R.
6-36-2
Kypson P.[5]
Artnak B.
6-16-3
Popko D.[4]
Mayo A.
6-33-66-4
Holt B.[6]
Cassone M.
7-657-5
Basing M.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-21-66-3
Pannu K.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-16-4
Quinn E.[8]
Overbeck C.
6-36-0
Quan R.
Den Ouden G.
3-66-36-4
Zakharov A.
Braswell M.
6-36-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Kuzuhara B.
6-36-4