Learner Tien vs Patrick Kypson — Fairfield CH Quarter-final

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Learner Tien
USA1
Learner Tien
#15ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 October 2024
hard
Patrick Kypson
USA5
Patrick Kypson
#112ATP
1641ELO
1611Hard ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
Tien L.
1-6 6-3 6-0
Kypson P.
Tien L.
1662
Kypson P.
6301

Learner Tien defeated Patrick Kypson 1-6 6-3 6-0 in the Fairfield CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Learner Tien came in ranked #15, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tien L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Kypson P.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tien L.Kypson P.
32
Serve
—
67
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tien L.Kypson P.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
67%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.5
7.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (142 vs 139). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tien L.Kypson P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
42
Break points saved·Even
97
93
Break points won·Dominant
83
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
17
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
100
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tien L.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Kypson P.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.5+293 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.5Hard Elo 1611
8.5Overall Elo 1941
ELO gap
1.5Overall Elo 1641
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
2.2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
3.4
Minutes 14d
9.3
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tien L.Kypson P.
Freshness·Even
95
94

Tien L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Kypson P.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Tien L.[1]
Tomic B.[7]
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Tien L.[1]
Holt B.[6]
6-05-76-4
Tomic B.[7]
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Tien L.[1]
Kypson P.[5]
1-66-36-0
Holt B.[6]
Popko D.[4]
6-26-4
Tomic B.[7]
Galarneau A.
7-661-67-66
Schoolkate T.[2]
Quinn E.[8]
6-06-737-63
R16
Galarneau A.
Pannu K.
6-46-1
Tien L.[1]
Kodat T.
7-56-4
Kypson P.[5]
Butvilas E.
6-36-4
Popko D.[4]
Seggerman R.
7-56-1
Holt B.[6]
Spizzirri E.
7-57-5
Tomic B.[7]
Basing M.
4-67-616-1
Quinn E.[8]
Quan R.
6-32-66-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Zakharov A.
6-36-4
R32
Tomic B.[7]
Wiskandt M.
7-667-65
Spizzirri E.
Hilderbrand T.
6-33-1
Seggerman R.
Boitan G.
7-57-5
Galarneau A.
Wolf J.[3]
7-626-4
Tien L.[1]
Oliveira G.
6-26-2
Kodat T.
Mejia N.
6-42-66-2
Butvilas E.
Bertola R.
6-36-2
Kypson P.[5]
Artnak B.
6-16-3
Popko D.[4]
Mayo A.
6-33-66-4
Holt B.[6]
Cassone M.
7-657-5
Basing M.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-21-66-3
Pannu K.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-16-4
Quinn E.[8]
Overbeck C.
6-36-0
Quan R.
Den Ouden G.
3-66-36-4
Zakharov A.
Braswell M.
6-36-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Kuzuhara B.
6-36-4