Learner Tien vs Toby Alex Kodat — Fairfield CH Round of 16

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Learner Tien
USA1
Learner Tien
#15ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 October 2024
hard
USA
Toby Alex Kodat
23 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWW
Tien L.
7-5 6-4
Kodat T.
Tien L.
762
Kodat T.
540

Learner Tien defeated Toby Alex Kodat 7-5 6-4 in the Fairfield CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Learner Tien came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tien L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kodat T.

Kodat T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tien L.Kodat T.
32
Serve
—
67
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tien L.Kodat T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (142 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tien L.Kodat T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
40
Break points saved·Dominant
97
40
Break points won·Dominant
83
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
100
89
Tiebreaks·
100
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tien L.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Kodat T.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
3.2
Fatigue & Travel
3.4
Minutes 14d
7.5
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tien L.Kodat T.
Freshness·
95
—

Tien L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Tien L.[1]
Tomic B.[7]
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Tien L.[1]
Holt B.[6]
6-05-76-4
Tomic B.[7]
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Tien L.[1]
Kypson P.[5]
1-66-36-0
Holt B.[6]
Popko D.[4]
6-26-4
Tomic B.[7]
Galarneau A.
7-661-67-66
Schoolkate T.[2]
Quinn E.[8]
6-06-737-63
R16
Galarneau A.
Pannu K.
6-46-1
Tien L.[1]
Kodat T.
7-56-4
Kypson P.[5]
Butvilas E.
6-36-4
Popko D.[4]
Seggerman R.
7-56-1
Holt B.[6]
Spizzirri E.
7-57-5
Tomic B.[7]
Basing M.
4-67-616-1
Quinn E.[8]
Quan R.
6-32-66-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Zakharov A.
6-36-4
R32
Tomic B.[7]
Wiskandt M.
7-667-65
Spizzirri E.
Hilderbrand T.
6-33-1
Seggerman R.
Boitan G.
7-57-5
Galarneau A.
Wolf J.[3]
7-626-4
Tien L.[1]
Oliveira G.
6-26-2
Kodat T.
Mejia N.
6-42-66-2
Butvilas E.
Bertola R.
6-36-2
Kypson P.[5]
Artnak B.
6-16-3
Popko D.[4]
Mayo A.
6-33-66-4
Holt B.[6]
Cassone M.
7-657-5
Basing M.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-21-66-3
Pannu K.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-16-4
Quinn E.[8]
Overbeck C.
6-36-0
Quan R.
Den Ouden G.
3-66-36-4
Zakharov A.
Braswell M.
6-36-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Kuzuhara B.
6-36-4