Learner Tien vs Brandon Holt — Fairfield CH Semi-final

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Learner Tien
USA1
Learner Tien
#15ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 7 October 2024
hard
USA6
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Tien L.
6-0 5-7 6-4
Holt B.
Tien L.
6562
Holt B.
0741

Learner Tien defeated Brandon Holt 6-0 5-7 6-4 in the Fairfield CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Learner Tien came in ranked #15, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tien L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Tien L.Holt B.
32
Serve
—
67
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Tien L.Holt B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.5
4.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
0.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (142 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tien L.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
58
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
85
Break points won·Dominant
83
31
Deciding sets·Clear edge
100
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
100
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tien L.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Holt B.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.7+397 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.3Hard Elo 1507
9.6Overall Elo 1941
ELO gap
0.4Overall Elo 1537
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.6
Surface form
3.1
Fatigue & Travel
3.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tien L.Holt B.
Freshness·
95
—

Tien L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Tien L.[1]
Tomic B.[7]
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Tien L.[1]
Holt B.[6]
6-05-76-4
Tomic B.[7]
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Tien L.[1]
Kypson P.[5]
1-66-36-0
Holt B.[6]
Popko D.[4]
6-26-4
Tomic B.[7]
Galarneau A.
7-661-67-66
Schoolkate T.[2]
Quinn E.[8]
6-06-737-63
R16
Galarneau A.
Pannu K.
6-46-1
Tien L.[1]
Kodat T.
7-56-4
Kypson P.[5]
Butvilas E.
6-36-4
Popko D.[4]
Seggerman R.
7-56-1
Holt B.[6]
Spizzirri E.
7-57-5
Tomic B.[7]
Basing M.
4-67-616-1
Quinn E.[8]
Quan R.
6-32-66-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Zakharov A.
6-36-4
R32
Tomic B.[7]
Wiskandt M.
7-667-65
Spizzirri E.
Hilderbrand T.
6-33-1
Seggerman R.
Boitan G.
7-57-5
Galarneau A.
Wolf J.[3]
7-626-4
Tien L.[1]
Oliveira G.
6-26-2
Kodat T.
Mejia N.
6-42-66-2
Butvilas E.
Bertola R.
6-36-2
Kypson P.[5]
Artnak B.
6-16-3
Popko D.[4]
Mayo A.
6-33-66-4
Holt B.[6]
Cassone M.
7-657-5
Basing M.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-21-66-3
Pannu K.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-16-4
Quinn E.[8]
Overbeck C.
6-36-0
Quan R.
Den Ouden G.
3-66-36-4
Zakharov A.
Braswell M.
6-36-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Kuzuhara B.
6-36-4