Ryan Seggerman vs Gabi Adrian Boitan — Fairfield CH Round of 32

Fairfield CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Ryan Seggerman
#649ATP
26 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 7 October 2024
hard
ROU
Gabi Adrian Boitan
1370ELO
1345Hard ELO
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWLL
Seggerman R.
7-5 7-5
Boitan G.
Seggerman R.
772
Boitan G.
550

Ryan Seggerman defeated Gabi Adrian Boitan 7-5 7-5 in the Fairfield CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Seggerman R.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Boitan G.

Boitan G.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Seggerman R.

Serve advantage — Boitan G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Seggerman R.Boitan G.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.1
3.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
5.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Seggerman R.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Boitan G.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
6.0
3-set count
4.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Seggerman R.Boitan G.
Freshness·
93
—

Seggerman R.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Tien L.[1]
Tomic B.[7]
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Tien L.[1]
Holt B.[6]
6-05-76-4
Tomic B.[7]
Schoolkate T.[2]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Tien L.[1]
Kypson P.[5]
1-66-36-0
Holt B.[6]
Popko D.[4]
6-26-4
Tomic B.[7]
Galarneau A.
7-661-67-66
Schoolkate T.[2]
Quinn E.[8]
6-06-737-63
R16
Galarneau A.
Pannu K.
6-46-1
Tien L.[1]
Kodat T.
7-56-4
Kypson P.[5]
Butvilas E.
6-36-4
Popko D.[4]
Seggerman R.
7-56-1
Holt B.[6]
Spizzirri E.
7-57-5
Tomic B.[7]
Basing M.
4-67-616-1
Quinn E.[8]
Quan R.
6-32-66-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Zakharov A.
6-36-4
R32
Tomic B.[7]
Wiskandt M.
7-667-65
Spizzirri E.
Hilderbrand T.
6-33-1
Seggerman R.
Boitan G.
7-57-5
Galarneau A.
Wolf J.[3]
7-626-4
Tien L.[1]
Oliveira G.
6-26-2
Kodat T.
Mejia N.
6-42-66-2
Butvilas E.
Bertola R.
6-36-2
Kypson P.[5]
Artnak B.
6-16-3
Popko D.[4]
Mayo A.
6-33-66-4
Holt B.[6]
Cassone M.
7-657-5
Basing M.
Pinnington Jones J.
6-21-66-3
Pannu K.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-16-4
Quinn E.[8]
Overbeck C.
6-36-0
Quan R.
Den Ouden G.
3-66-36-4
Zakharov A.
Braswell M.
6-36-2
Schoolkate T.[2]
Kuzuhara B.
6-36-4