Li Tu vs Mikhail Kukushkin — Shanghai Masters Qualifying Round 1

Shanghai Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
AUS
Li Tu
#421ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Wednesday, 2 October 2024
hard
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ5
Mikhail Kukushkin
#305ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
Tu L.
7-5 4-2
Kukushkin M.
Tu L.
74–
Kukushkin M.
52–

Li Tu advanced when Mikhail Kukushkin retired 7-5 4-2 in the Shanghai Masters qualifying round 1. Li Tu claimed a first win over Mikhail Kukushkin in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-05-27Roland GarrosQ2clayMikhail Kukushkin6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Kukushkin M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Kukushkin M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.7
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.8
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (125 vs 165). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Kukushkin M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
46
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
93
Break points won·Dominant
8
41
Deciding sets·Clear edge
20
41
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
64
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Kukushkin M.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.4Hard Elo 1471
Surface ELO
5.6+55 Hard Elo edge
4.5Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
5.5Overall Elo 1552
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
7.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
7.2
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Country comfort
5.3
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
22°COvercast
Wind 22 km/hHumidity 50%
Q2
Vukic A.[2]
Krueger M.[20]
6-46-4
Shapovalov D.[6]
Shimabukuro S.[24]
4-63-1
Evans D.
Bolt A.
6-21-67-5
Ramanathan R.
Sun F.
6-26-4
Diallo G.[9]
Trungelliti M.[16]
6-37-5
Atmane T.[23]
Walton A.[3]
6-746-46-4
Bellucci M.[7]
Karatsev A.[17]
7-636-1
Zhukayev B.
Harris B.[8]
7-52-66-4
Svajda Z.[14]
Bai Y.
6-26-2
Watanuki Y.
Hong S.[19]
6-27-5
Gerasimov E.
Moro Canas A.[22]
6-736-37-66
Tu L.
Xiao L.
6-26-2
Q1
Vukic A.[2]
Cressy M.
6-47-63
Zhukayev B.
Van Wyk K.
6-36-2
Diallo G.[9]
Hassan B.
6-07-63
Atmane T.[23]
Te R.
6-47-62
Svajda Z.[14]
Wu T.
6-06-1
Sun F.
Coric B.[4]
6-756-17-69
Gerasimov E.
Marterer M.[10]
7-644-66-3
Trungelliti M.[16]
Cui J.
6-46-2
Shapovalov D.[6]
Hsu Y.
6-36-3
Ramanathan R.
Blanchet U.[18]
6-44-66-4
Karatsev A.[17]
Dougaz A.
6-726-46-4
Bai Y.
Tseng C.[12]
6-43-67-5
Watanuki Y.
Virtanen O.[11]
6-746-26-0
Krueger M.[20]
Svrcina D.
7-57-5
Hong S.[19]
Marchenko I.
7-656-4
Shimabukuro S.[24]
Yevseyev D.
6-766-46-1
Tu L.
Kukushkin M.[5]
7-54-2
Evans D.
Uchiyama Y.[15]
6-756-16-4
Harris B.[8]
Ursu V.
6-26-4
Bolt A.
Hanfmann Y.[1]
7-616-4
Xiao L.
Mochizuki S.[21]
6-26-3
Moro Canas A.[22]
Kachmazov A.
6-36-2
Walton A.[3]
Kasnikowski M.
6-17-68
Bellucci M.[7]
Shimizu Y.
7-57-62