Egor Gerasimov vs Maximilian Marterer — Shanghai Masters Qualifying Round 1

Shanghai Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
BLR
Egor Gerasimov
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Wednesday, 2 October 2024
hard
GER10
Maximilian Marterer
31 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
Gerasimov E.
7-6 4-6 6-3
Marterer M.
Gerasimov E.
77462
Marterer M.
64631

Egor Gerasimov defeated Maximilian Marterer 7-6 4-6 6-3 in the Shanghai Masters qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Maximilian Marterer came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Egor Gerasimov claimed a first win over Maximilian Marterer in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Egor Gerasimov closed it out in three sets, 7–6 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-09-07KitzbuhelQ2clayMaximilian Marterer6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Gerasimov E.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Marterer M.

Marterer M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gerasimov E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gerasimov E.Marterer M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.5
4.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 63). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gerasimov E.Marterer M.
Clutch Rating·Even
44
47
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
93
Break points won·Slight edge
8
13
Deciding sets·Even
70
69
Tiebreaks·Even
40
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gerasimov E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Marterer M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.0
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
22°COvercast
Wind 22 km/hHumidity 50%
Q2
Vukic A.[2]
Krueger M.[20]
6-46-4
Shapovalov D.[6]
Shimabukuro S.[24]
4-63-1
Evans D.
Bolt A.
6-21-67-5
Ramanathan R.
Sun F.
6-26-4
Diallo G.[9]
Trungelliti M.[16]
6-37-5
Atmane T.[23]
Walton A.[3]
6-746-46-4
Bellucci M.[7]
Karatsev A.[17]
7-636-1
Zhukayev B.
Harris B.[8]
7-52-66-4
Svajda Z.[14]
Bai Y.
6-26-2
Watanuki Y.
Hong S.[19]
6-27-5
Gerasimov E.
Moro Canas A.[22]
6-736-37-66
Tu L.
Xiao L.
6-26-2
Q1
Vukic A.[2]
Cressy M.
6-47-63
Zhukayev B.
Van Wyk K.
6-36-2
Diallo G.[9]
Hassan B.
6-07-63
Atmane T.[23]
Te R.
6-47-62
Svajda Z.[14]
Wu T.
6-06-1
Sun F.
Coric B.[4]
6-756-17-69
Gerasimov E.
Marterer M.[10]
7-644-66-3
Trungelliti M.[16]
Cui J.
6-46-2
Shapovalov D.[6]
Hsu Y.
6-36-3
Ramanathan R.
Blanchet U.[18]
6-44-66-4
Karatsev A.[17]
Dougaz A.
6-726-46-4
Bai Y.
Tseng C.[12]
6-43-67-5
Watanuki Y.
Virtanen O.[11]
6-746-26-0
Krueger M.[20]
Svrcina D.
7-57-5
Hong S.[19]
Marchenko I.
7-656-4
Shimabukuro S.[24]
Yevseyev D.
6-766-46-1
Tu L.
Kukushkin M.[5]
7-54-2
Evans D.
Uchiyama Y.[15]
6-756-16-4
Harris B.[8]
Ursu V.
6-26-4
Bolt A.
Hanfmann Y.[1]
7-616-4
Xiao L.
Mochizuki S.[21]
6-26-3
Moro Canas A.[22]
Kachmazov A.
6-36-2
Walton A.[3]
Kasnikowski M.
6-17-68
Bellucci M.[7]
Shimizu Y.
7-57-62