Albert Ramos vs Carlos Taberner — Braga CH Quarter-final

Braga CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ESP6
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 September 2024
clay
Carlos Taberner
ESP
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
Ramos A.
6-3 6-3
Taberner C.
Ramos A.
662
Taberner C.
330

Albert Ramos defeated Carlos Taberner 6-3 6-3 in the Braga CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Albert Ramos came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Albert Ramos extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-02-21SantiagoR16clayAlbert Ramos6-2 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Taberner C.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Taberner C.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
43%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Even
1.7
1.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (89 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Taberner C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
53
Break points saved·Clear edge
95
74
Break points won·Slight edge
49
59
Deciding sets·Slight edge
80
75
Tiebreaks·Even
22
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ramos A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Taberner C.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.0Clay Elo 1526
Surface ELO
6.0+79 Clay Elo edge
4.3Overall Elo 1558
ELO gap
5.7Overall Elo 1610
6.1
H2H
3.9
4.3
Surface form
6.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
4.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Moller E.
Galan D.[5]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Galan D.[5]
Pellegrino A.
7-646-1
Moller E.
Ramos A.[6]
7-57-62
Quarter-finals
Galan D.[5]
Neumayer L.
6-46-2
Ramos A.[6]
Taberner C.
6-36-3
Moller E.
Kopriva V.[7]
6-36-1
Pellegrino A.
Tabur C.
3-67-56-3
R16
Moller E.
Passaro F.[2]
W/O
Tabur C.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-3
Galan D.[5]
Domingues J.
6-36-1
Neumayer L.
Tirante T.[1]
6-36-1
Taberner C.
Garin C.[3]
3-67-56-4
Ramos A.[6]
Nava E.
3-66-16-3
Kopriva V.[7]
Buse I.
6-04-66-1
Pellegrino A.
Gaubas V.
6-26-1
R32
Tabur C.
Kovalik J.[4]
4-3
Ramos A.[6]
Faria J.
6-26-4
Tirante T.[1]
Dodig M.
7-636-4
Passaro F.[2]
Planinsek F.
6-46-2
Garin C.[3]
Choinski J.
6-26-756-1
Galan D.[5]
Jianu F.
6-46-4
Kopriva V.[7]
Vanshelboim E.
3-66-26-1
Gaubas V.
Barrios Vera T.[8]
6-44-67-5
Barranco Cosano J.
Collignon R.
6-45-76-4
Buse I.
Gea A.
7-56-3
Domingues J.
Elias G.
7-646-1
Moller E.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-3
Nava E.
Araujo P.
6-24-66-3
Neumayer L.
Rocha H.
6-36-1
Pellegrino A.
Andreev A.
6-31-66-2
Taberner C.
Barton H.
6-06-3