Albert Ramos vs Emilio Nava — Braga CH Round of 16

Braga CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ESP6
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 30 September 2024
clay
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
Ramos A.
3-6 6-1 6-3
Nava E.
Ramos A.
3662
Nava E.
6131

Albert Ramos defeated Emilio Nava 3-6 6-1 6-3 in the Braga CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Nava E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Serve advantage — Nava E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ramos A.Nava E.
—
Serve
22
—
Return
1

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Nava E.
1st serve in·Even
65%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.7
7.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (89 vs 189). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Nava E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
52
Break points saved·Even
95
94
Break points won·Dominant
49
17
Deciding sets·Slight edge
80
89
Tiebreaks·Even
22
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ramos A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Nava E.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.3Clay Elo 1526
Surface ELO
6.7+160 Clay Elo edge
3.2Overall Elo 1558
ELO gap
6.8Overall Elo 1704
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
5.4
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
6.1
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Ramos A.Nava E.
Freshness·
—
100

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Moller E.
Galan D.[5]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Galan D.[5]
Pellegrino A.
7-646-1
Moller E.
Ramos A.[6]
7-57-62
Quarter-finals
Galan D.[5]
Neumayer L.
6-46-2
Ramos A.[6]
Taberner C.
6-36-3
Moller E.
Kopriva V.[7]
6-36-1
Pellegrino A.
Tabur C.
3-67-56-3
R16
Moller E.
Passaro F.[2]
W/O
Tabur C.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-36-3
Galan D.[5]
Domingues J.
6-36-1
Neumayer L.
Tirante T.[1]
6-36-1
Taberner C.
Garin C.[3]
3-67-56-4
Ramos A.[6]
Nava E.
3-66-16-3
Kopriva V.[7]
Buse I.
6-04-66-1
Pellegrino A.
Gaubas V.
6-26-1
R32
Tabur C.
Kovalik J.[4]
4-3
Ramos A.[6]
Faria J.
6-26-4
Tirante T.[1]
Dodig M.
7-636-4
Passaro F.[2]
Planinsek F.
6-46-2
Garin C.[3]
Choinski J.
6-26-756-1
Galan D.[5]
Jianu F.
6-46-4
Kopriva V.[7]
Vanshelboim E.
3-66-26-1
Gaubas V.
Barrios Vera T.[8]
6-44-67-5
Barranco Cosano J.
Collignon R.
6-45-76-4
Buse I.
Gea A.
7-56-3
Domingues J.
Elias G.
7-646-1
Moller E.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-46-3
Nava E.
Araujo P.
6-24-66-3
Neumayer L.
Rocha H.
6-36-1
Pellegrino A.
Andreev A.
6-31-66-2
Taberner C.
Barton H.
6-06-3