Tung Lin Wu vs James Mccabe — Nonthaburi 4 CH Semi-final

Nonthaburi 4 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Tuesday, 24 September 2024
hard
AUS
James Mccabe
#242ATP
1532ELO
1481Hard ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
Wu T.
6-1 3-6 7-6
Mccabe J.
Wu T.
63772
Mccabe J.
16621

Tung Lin Wu defeated James Mccabe 6-1 3-6 7-6 in the Nonthaburi 4 CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mccabe J.

Mccabe J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Mccabe J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.8
7.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (131 vs 146). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Mccabe J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
10
37
Break points saved·Even
84
85
Break points won·Even
6
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
6
71
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
4
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wu T.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Mccabe J.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.3Hard Elo 1376
Surface ELO
5.7+106 Hard Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1406
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1532
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
7.3
Surface form
4.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
6.3
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
4.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Mccabe J.
Freshness·Clear edge
80
95

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d) · Mccabe J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Wu T.
Mcdonald M.
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Mcdonald M.
Wong C.[8]
6-36-4
Wu T.
Mccabe J.
6-13-67-62
Quarter-finals
Mccabe J.
Cazaux A.[1]
7-644-66-3
Wong C.[8]
Walton A.[2]
6-46-4
Mcdonald M.
Diallo G.[3]
7-666-3
Wu T.
Svrcina D.
6-16-1
R16
Diallo G.[3]
Oliveira G.
6-32-0
Wu T.
Yevseyev D.
6-44-1
Cazaux A.[1]
Simakin I.
6-26-4
Walton A.[2]
Bolt A.
7-646-3
Mccabe J.
Karatsev A.[5]
6-16-4
Mcdonald M.
Krueger M.[7]
6-36-2
Wong C.[8]
Evans D.
6-47-5
Svrcina D.
Noguchi R.
6-47-5
R32
Noguchi R.
Marterer M.[4]
7-637-5
Yevseyev D.
Gerasimov E.
6-16-2
Karatsev A.[5]
Marchenko I.
6-16-4
Cazaux A.[1]
Ursu V.
6-16-2
Walton A.[2]
Hsu Y.
6-36-3
Diallo G.[3]
Nam J.
7-696-0
Wu T.
Trungelliti M.[6]
6-16-3
Krueger M.[7]
Dzhavakian Y.
6-26-1
Wong C.[8]
Samrej K.
6-46-3
Bolt A.
Shimizu Y.
7-677-5
Evans D.
Sultanov K.
4-66-26-2
Mccabe J.
Moro Canas A.
6-47-62
Mcdonald M.
Chanta T.
6-36-1
Oliveira G.
Zhukayev B.
7-656-4
Simakin I.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
7-56-2
Svrcina D.
Leong M.
6-16-1