Bernard Tomic vs Denis Kudla — Charleston CH Round of 32

Charleston CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2024
hard
USA5
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWL
Tomic B.
6-4 2-6 7-6
Kudla D.
Tomic B.
62772
Kudla D.
46631

Bernard Tomic defeated Denis Kudla 6-4 2-6 7-6 in the Charleston CH round of 32 on hard. Bernard Tomic extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Bernard Tomic closed it out in three sets, 6–4 2–6 7–6.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-01-20Australian OpenQ1hardDenis Kudla7-6(4) 6-3
2019-04-08HoustonR32clayBernard Tomic7-6(8) 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Kudla D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Kudla D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Even
5.6
6.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 44). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tomic B.Kudla D.
Clutch Rating·Even
53
50
Break points saved·Even
92
90
Break points won·Clear edge
4
19
Deciding sets·Slight edge
74
81
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Kudla D.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0
H2H
0.0
5.1
Surface form
6.9
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
5.3
7.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Kudla D.
Freshness·
84
—

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Butvilas E.
Basavareddy N.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.
Eubanks C.[1]
6-47-65
Butvilas E.
Boyer T.[8]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.[1]
Galarneau A.
6-43-66-2
Boyer T.[8]
Tien L.[2]
7-662-66-3
Basavareddy N.
Wolf J.[4]
7-56-2
Butvilas E.
Tomic B.
3-66-36-2
R16
Tien L.[2]
Escobedo E.
W/O
Basavareddy N.
Quinn E.
6-27-5
Tomic B.
Nakagawa N.
6-16-3
Eubanks C.[1]
Martin A.
6-36-2
Butvilas E.
Schoolkate T.[3]
7-676-4
Wolf J.[4]
Stricker D.
6-33-67-61
Galarneau A.
Shelbayh A.[7]
6-36-0
Boyer T.[8]
Bertola R.
6-36-2
R32
Schoolkate T.[3]
Dostanic S.
6-04-62-1
Quinn E.
Holt B.[9]
7-647-65
Eubanks C.[1]
Artnak B.
6-46-746-3
Tien L.[2]
Marie J.
6-16-2
Wolf J.[4]
Sweeny D.
6-46-0
Tomic B.
Kudla D.[5]
6-42-67-63
Shelbayh A.[7]
Monday J.
7-56-3
Boyer T.[8]
Braswell M.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.
Rybakov A.
4-66-46-4
Bertola R.
Mayo A.
6-45-76-4
Butvilas E.
Trotter J.
6-22-67-5
Escobedo E.
Nanda G.
6-26-4
Galarneau A.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-656-4
Martin A.
Andrade A.
6-27-5
Nakagawa N.
Lieberman H.
6-26-2
Stricker D.
Corwin F.
6-36-4