Govind Nanda vs Cannon Kingsley — Charleston CH Qualifying Round 1

Charleston CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA
Govind Nanda
#781ATP
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2024
hard
USA11
Cannon Kingsley
#421ATP
1342ELO
1345Hard ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLWWLW
Nanda G.
6-3 6-3
Kingsley C.
Nanda G.
662
Kingsley C.
330

Govind Nanda defeated Cannon Kingsley 6-3 6-3 in the Charleston CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nanda G.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kingsley C.

Kingsley C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Nanda G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nanda G.Kingsley C.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.6
6.0
Double faults / match·Even
1.9
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (48 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nanda G.Kingsley C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
5
21
Break points saved·Dominant
38
74
Break points won·Even
22
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
15
27
Tiebreaks·
—
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nanda G.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kingsley C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
1.6
Surface form
2.2
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
8.1
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Q2
Escobedo E.[8]
Boitan G.[2]
6-36-4
Rybakov A.
Butvilas E.[3]
6-727-57-5
Artnak B.[4]
Zink T.
7-636-4
Nanda G.
Peniston R.[5]
6-46-4
Corwin F.
Kodat T.[6]
7-56-2
Dostanic S.
Hilderbrand T.
3-66-36-2
Q1
Dostanic S.
Spizzirri E.[1]
3-67-646-4
Boitan G.[2]
Kirchheimer S.
6-46-4
Artnak B.[4]
Bertran P.
6-46-3
Peniston R.[5]
Bigun K.
6-36-2
Kodat T.[6]
Ghibaudo A.
1-67-56-4
Zink T.
Kuzuhara B.[7]
6-23-66-2
Escobedo E.[8]
Maloney P.
6-36-2
Corwin F.
Pannu K.[9]
6-26-2
Rybakov A.
Saville L.[10]
6-36-4
Nanda G.
Kingsley C.[11]
6-36-3
Hilderbrand T.
Langmo C.[12]
6-46-2