Emilio Nava vs Vilius Gaubas — Lisbon CH Round of 32

Lisbon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2024
clay
LTU
Vilius Gaubas
#128ATP
1581ELO
1535Clay ELO
$275kYTD
$759kCAREER
21 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWLLL
Nava E.
6-4 6-3
Gaubas V.
Nava E.
662
Gaubas V.
430

Emilio Nava defeated Vilius Gaubas 6-4 6-3 in the Lisbon CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

  • Match story: Emilio Nava closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gaubas V.

Gaubas V.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Nava E.Gaubas V.
22
Serve
—
1
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Gaubas V.
1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (189 vs 163). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Gaubas V.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
52
57
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
87
Break points won·Dominant
17
52
Deciding sets·Even
89
86
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
7

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Gaubas V.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.7+151 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.3Clay Elo 1535
5.6Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1581
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
5.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
9.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Gaubas V.
Freshness·Dominant
100
70

Nava E.: 15 days rest · Gaubas V.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 73 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ritschard A.[7]
Collignon R.
6-36-736-3
Semi-finals
Ritschard A.[7]
Nava E.
7-636-0
Collignon R.
Moller E.
6-726-26-4
Quarter-finals
Moller E.
Tirante T.[4]
6-44-66-3
Ritschard A.[7]
Barrios Vera T.
6-34-66-2
Collignon R.
Piros Z.
6-16-0
Nava E.
Rocha H.
6-16-2
R16
Moller E.
Roca Batalla O.
6-31-0
Ritschard A.[7]
Pavlovic L.
6-16-1
Nava E.
Fonio G.
6-36-3
Tirante T.[4]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-1
Collignon R.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-36-3
Barrios Vera T.
Tabur C.
6-36-2
Piros Z.
Dodig M.
3-66-26-1
Rocha H.
Arnaboldi F.
6-22-66-0
R32
Barrios Vera T.
Altmaier D.[2]
4-66-47-65
Roca Batalla O.
Faria J.
7-56-2
Tabur C.
Andreev A.
3-66-36-4
Rocha H.
Seyboth Wild T.[3]
7-646-3
Tirante T.[4]
Dalla Valle E.
6-47-64
Kovalik J.[5]
Klizan M.
6-37-66
Ritschard A.[7]
Gea A.
7-54-66-4
Fonio G.
Galan D.[8]
7-624-67-64
Moller E.
Pellegrino A.[9]
6-36-1
Arnaboldi F.
Vale D.
7-656-1
Collignon R.
Elias G.
7-56-3
Dodig M.
Kopp S.
6-36-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Skatov T.
4-66-26-2
Nava E.
Gaubas V.
6-46-3
Pavlovic L.
Novak D.
7-643-66-3
Piros Z.
Rincon D.
7-626-4