Emilio Nava vs Giovanni Fonio — Lisbon CH Round of 16

Lisbon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Emilio Nava
USA
Emilio Nava
#91ATP
1704ELO
1686Clay ELO
$533kYTD
$2.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2024
clay
ITA
Giovanni Fonio
#910ATP
1349ELO
1319Clay ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWL
Nava E.
6-3 6-3
Fonio G.
Nava E.
662
Fonio G.
330

Emilio Nava defeated Giovanni Fonio 6-3 6-3 in the Lisbon CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Emilio Nava came in ranked #91.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nava E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Fonio G.

Fonio G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Nava E.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Nava E.Fonio G.
22
Serve
—
1
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Nava E.Fonio G.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (189 vs 109). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nava E.Fonio G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
6
Break points saved·Dominant
94
63
Break points won·Slight edge
17
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
10
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
23
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nava E.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Fonio G.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.3+367 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.7Clay Elo 1319
9.4Overall Elo 1704
ELO gap
0.6Overall Elo 1349
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
4.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nava E.Fonio G.
Freshness·
100
—

Nava E.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ritschard A.[7]
Collignon R.
6-36-736-3
Semi-finals
Ritschard A.[7]
Nava E.
7-636-0
Collignon R.
Moller E.
6-726-26-4
Quarter-finals
Moller E.
Tirante T.[4]
6-44-66-3
Ritschard A.[7]
Barrios Vera T.
6-34-66-2
Collignon R.
Piros Z.
6-16-0
Nava E.
Rocha H.
6-16-2
R16
Moller E.
Roca Batalla O.
6-31-0
Ritschard A.[7]
Pavlovic L.
6-16-1
Nava E.
Fonio G.
6-36-3
Tirante T.[4]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-36-1
Collignon R.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-36-3
Barrios Vera T.
Tabur C.
6-36-2
Piros Z.
Dodig M.
3-66-26-1
Rocha H.
Arnaboldi F.
6-22-66-0
R32
Barrios Vera T.
Altmaier D.[2]
4-66-47-65
Roca Batalla O.
Faria J.
7-56-2
Tabur C.
Andreev A.
3-66-36-4
Rocha H.
Seyboth Wild T.[3]
7-646-3
Tirante T.[4]
Dalla Valle E.
6-47-64
Kovalik J.[5]
Klizan M.
6-37-66
Ritschard A.[7]
Gea A.
7-54-66-4
Fonio G.
Galan D.[8]
7-624-67-64
Moller E.
Pellegrino A.[9]
6-36-1
Arnaboldi F.
Vale D.
7-656-1
Collignon R.
Elias G.
7-56-3
Dodig M.
Kopp S.
6-36-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Skatov T.
4-66-26-2
Nava E.
Gaubas V.
6-46-3
Pavlovic L.
Novak D.
7-643-66-3
Piros Z.
Rincon D.
7-626-4