Tristan Boyer vs Learner Tien — Charleston CH Quarter-final

Charleston CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Tristan Boyer
USA8
Tristan Boyer
#164ATP
1561ELO
1525Hard ELO
$105kYTD
$960kCAREER
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2024
hard
Learner Tien
USA2
Learner Tien
#15ATP
1941ELO
1904Hard ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.4MCAREER
20 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
Boyer T.
7-6 2-6 6-3
Tien L.
Boyer T.
78262
Tien L.
66631

Tristan Boyer defeated Learner Tien 7-6 2-6 6-3 in the Charleston CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Learner Tien came in ranked #15.

Key context

  • Match story: Tristan Boyer closed it out in three sets, 7–6 2–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Boyer T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tien L.

Tien L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Boyer T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Boyer T.Tien L.
—
Serve
32
—
Return
67

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Boyer T.Tien L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.7
4.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (145 vs 142). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Boyer T.Tien L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
43
90
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
97
Break points won·Dominant
20
83
Deciding sets·Clear edge
81
100
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
100

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Boyer T.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Tien L.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
0.1Hard Elo 1525
Surface ELO
9.9+379 Hard Elo edge
0.0Overall Elo 1561
ELO gap
10.0Overall Elo 1941
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
7.2
Surface form
9.2
Win streak
9.05-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
0.1
Minutes 14d
4.5
0.0
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Boyer T.Tien L.
Freshness·Slight edge
100
95

Boyer T.: 15 days rest · Tien L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Butvilas E.
Basavareddy N.
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Basavareddy N.
Eubanks C.[1]
6-47-65
Butvilas E.
Boyer T.[8]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.[1]
Galarneau A.
6-43-66-2
Boyer T.[8]
Tien L.[2]
7-662-66-3
Basavareddy N.
Wolf J.[4]
7-56-2
Butvilas E.
Tomic B.
3-66-36-2
R16
Tien L.[2]
Escobedo E.
W/O
Basavareddy N.
Quinn E.
6-27-5
Tomic B.
Nakagawa N.
6-16-3
Eubanks C.[1]
Martin A.
6-36-2
Butvilas E.
Schoolkate T.[3]
7-676-4
Wolf J.[4]
Stricker D.
6-33-67-61
Galarneau A.
Shelbayh A.[7]
6-36-0
Boyer T.[8]
Bertola R.
6-36-2
R32
Schoolkate T.[3]
Dostanic S.
6-04-62-1
Quinn E.
Holt B.[9]
7-647-65
Eubanks C.[1]
Artnak B.
6-46-746-3
Tien L.[2]
Marie J.
6-16-2
Wolf J.[4]
Sweeny D.
6-46-0
Tomic B.
Kudla D.[5]
6-42-67-63
Shelbayh A.[7]
Monday J.
7-56-3
Boyer T.[8]
Braswell M.
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.
Rybakov A.
4-66-46-4
Bertola R.
Mayo A.
6-45-76-4
Butvilas E.
Trotter J.
6-22-67-5
Escobedo E.
Nanda G.
6-26-4
Galarneau A.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-656-4
Martin A.
Andrade A.
6-27-5
Nakagawa N.
Lieberman H.
6-26-2
Stricker D.
Corwin F.
6-36-4