Harold Mayot vs Benjamin Bonzi — Orleans CH Quarter-final

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Harold Mayot
FRA5
Harold Mayot
#200ATP
1571ELO
1548Hard ELO
$72kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2024
hard
Benjamin Bonzi
FRA
Benjamin Bonzi
#102ATP
1749ELO
1713Hard ELO
$396kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWL
Mayot H.
6-4 6-4
Bonzi B.
Mayot H.
662
Bonzi B.
440

Harold Mayot defeated Benjamin Bonzi 6-4 6-4 in the Orleans CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Benjamin Bonzi came in ranked #102, defending last year's quarter-final, but Harold Mayot had arrived on a 3-match winning run. Harold Mayot extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Harold Mayot edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-07-03WimbledonR128grassHarold Mayot6-3 6-4 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Mayot H.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bonzi B.

Bonzi B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Mayot H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Mayot H.Bonzi B.
—
Serve
27
—
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Mayot H.Bonzi B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Even
5.1
5.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (166 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mayot H.Bonzi B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
29
65
Break points saved·Even
92
96
Break points won·Slight edge
22
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
77
Tiebreaks·Dominant
8
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mayot H.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Bonzi B.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.3Hard Elo 1548
Surface ELO
6.7+165 Hard Elo edge
3.3Overall Elo 1571
ELO gap
6.7Overall Elo 1749
0.0
H2H
10.0
5.2
Surface form
4.0
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mayot H.Bonzi B.
Freshness·Even
100
96

Mayot H.: 15 days rest · Bonzi B.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Fearnley J.[8]
Mayot H.[5]
6-37-65
Semi-finals
Mayot H.[5]
Huesler M.
6-46-3
Fearnley J.[8]
Blockx A.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.[8]
Gigante M.
6-16-0
Blockx A.
Lajal M.
6-36-3
Mayot H.[5]
Bonzi B.
6-46-4
Huesler M.
Medjedovic H.
7-646-0
R16
Bonzi B.
Coulibaly E.
6-06-0
Blockx A.
Shapovalov D.[2]
6-46-756-2
Mayot H.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-47-64
Huesler M.
Herbert P.[7]
6-46-2
Fearnley J.[8]
Bertrand R.
6-36-3
Gigante M.
Grenier H.
6-47-5
Lajal M.
Hemery C.
6-43-67-63
Medjedovic H.
Gojo B.
6-746-36-2
R32
Coulibaly E.
Halys Q.[1]
7-684-67-66
Shapovalov D.[2]
Hassan B.
6-36-1
Gigante M.
Lestienne C.[3]
6-46-726-4
Gojo B.
Van Assche L.[4]
4-66-36-1
Mayot H.[5]
Majchrzak K.
6-44-67-61
Hemery C.
Gasquet R.[6]
7-636-3
Herbert P.[7]
Barrere G.
7-641-66-1
Fearnley J.[8]
Eysseric J.
6-23-66-1
Bertrand R.
Damm M.
2-66-47-64
Blockx A.
Gombos N.
6-16-4
Bonzi B.
Rodionov J.
6-46-2
Escoffier A.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-26-2
Grenier H.
Janvier M.
7-647-5
Huesler M.
Lamasine T.
6-26-2
Lajal M.
Martineau M.
4-67-56-3
Medjedovic H.
Vatutin A.
6-46-2