Borna Gojo vs Luca Van Assche — Orleans CH Round of 32

Orleans CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Borna Gojo
CRO
Borna Gojo
#168ATP
1683ELO
1662Hard ELO
$139kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 23 September 2024
hard
Luca Van Assche
FRA4
Luca Van Assche
#86ATP
1701ELO
1681Hard ELO
$411kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
22 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLWL
Gojo B.
4-6 6-3 6-1
Van Assche L.
Gojo B.
4662
Van Assche L.
6311

Borna Gojo defeated Luca Van Assche 4-6 6-3 6-1 in the Orleans CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Luca Van Assche came in ranked #86, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's semi-final. Borna Gojo claimed a first win over Luca Van Assche in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-06-26EastbourneQ2grassLuca Van Assche6-4 7-6(6)

Serve vs return

This season
Gojo B.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Van Assche L.

Van Assche L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gojo B.

Serve advantage — Gojo B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gojo B.Van Assche L.
1st serve in·Even
64%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.7
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (79 vs 168). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gojo B.Van Assche L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
53
68
Break points saved·Even
95
91
Break points won·Dominant
10
61
Deciding sets·Slight edge
70
81
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
73
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gojo B.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Van Assche L.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.7Hard Elo 1662
Surface ELO
5.3+19 Hard Elo edge
4.7Overall Elo 1683
ELO gap
5.3Overall Elo 1701
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.8
Surface form
5.7
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Gojo B.Van Assche L.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
77

Gojo B.: 20 days rest · Van Assche L.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 30 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Fearnley J.[8]
Mayot H.[5]
6-37-65
Semi-finals
Mayot H.[5]
Huesler M.
6-46-3
Fearnley J.[8]
Blockx A.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Fearnley J.[8]
Gigante M.
6-16-0
Blockx A.
Lajal M.
6-36-3
Mayot H.[5]
Bonzi B.
6-46-4
Huesler M.
Medjedovic H.
7-646-0
R16
Bonzi B.
Coulibaly E.
6-06-0
Blockx A.
Shapovalov D.[2]
6-46-756-2
Mayot H.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-47-64
Huesler M.
Herbert P.[7]
6-46-2
Fearnley J.[8]
Bertrand R.
6-36-3
Gigante M.
Grenier H.
6-47-5
Lajal M.
Hemery C.
6-43-67-63
Medjedovic H.
Gojo B.
6-746-36-2
R32
Coulibaly E.
Halys Q.[1]
7-684-67-66
Shapovalov D.[2]
Hassan B.
6-36-1
Gigante M.
Lestienne C.[3]
6-46-726-4
Gojo B.
Van Assche L.[4]
4-66-36-1
Mayot H.[5]
Majchrzak K.
6-44-67-61
Hemery C.
Gasquet R.[6]
7-636-3
Herbert P.[7]
Barrere G.
7-641-66-1
Fearnley J.[8]
Eysseric J.
6-23-66-1
Bertrand R.
Damm M.
2-66-47-64
Blockx A.
Gombos N.
6-16-4
Bonzi B.
Rodionov J.
6-46-2
Escoffier A.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-26-2
Grenier H.
Janvier M.
7-647-5
Huesler M.
Lamasine T.
6-26-2
Lajal M.
Martineau M.
4-67-56-3
Medjedovic H.
Vatutin A.
6-46-2