Tyler Zink vs Strong Kirchheimer — Columbus CH Qualifying Round 1
Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 September 2024
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
0.0
H2H10.0
3.6
Surface form4.4
0.0
Win streak0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d9.3
7.0
3-set count9.0
Prev. match9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts6.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Zink T.
66772
Kirchheimer S.
47951
Head to head
0–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | Champaign CH | R32 | hard | Strong Kirchheimer | 5-7 7-5 7-5 |
| 2022-11-14 | Champaign CH | Q1 | hard | Strong Kirchheimer | W/O |
Statistics
Recent form59%1st serve in+2%61%
73%1st serve points won+4%69%
54%2nd serve points won+5%49%
65%Service points won+4%61%
40%Return points won+4%36%
63%Break points saved+1%64%
5.6Aces / match+1.54.1
1.5Double faults / match+1.63.1
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw — qualifying
Q2
Edmund K.[1]
Zink T.
7-666-0
Zahraj P.[10]
Sheehy J.
6-36-3
Ghibaudo A.
Martin A.[5]
6-16-2
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Hilderbrand T.
6-41-67-5
Braswell M.[11]
Langmo C.[4]
7-56-1
Cassone M.
Papoe R.[8]
6-00-66-4
Q1
Ghibaudo A.
Maloney P.[12]
6-16-4
Langmo C.[4]
Claverie L.
6-777-656-1
Sheehy J.
Sharygin E.
6-06-1
Zahraj P.[10]
Stearns P.
3-66-16-4
Edmund K.[1]
Neff A.
3-66-26-4
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Nanda G.
6-12-66-2
Martin A.[5]
Jansen W.
6-36-747-5
Cassone M.
Kingsley C.[6]
6-33-67-64
Zink T.
Kirchheimer S.[7]
6-46-777-5
Papoe R.[8]
Kim A.
3-66-36-4
Hilderbrand T.
Corwin F.[9]
6-27-5
Braswell M.[11]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-23-67-5