Radu Mihai Papoe vs Aidan Kim — Columbus CH Qualifying Round 1

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
ROU8
Radu Mihai Papoe
#358ATP
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 September 2024
hard
USA
Aidan Kim
#661ATP
21 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLLWW
Papoe R.
3-6 6-3 6-4
Kim A.
Papoe R.
3662
Kim A.
6341

Radu Mihai Papoe defeated Aidan Kim 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the Columbus CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Papoe R.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kim A.

Kim A.serving65% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Papoe R.

Serve advantage — Papoe R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Papoe R.Kim A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
46%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
48%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.0
6.1
Double faults / match·Even
1.5
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (24 vs 10). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Papoe R.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Kim A.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Injury return: 469 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Papoe R.Kim A.
Freshness·
95
—

Papoe R.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Zahraj P.[10]
Sheehy J.
6-36-3
Edmund K.[1]
Zink T.
7-666-0
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Hilderbrand T.
6-41-67-5
Braswell M.[11]
Langmo C.[4]
7-56-1
Ghibaudo A.
Martin A.[5]
6-16-2
Cassone M.
Papoe R.[8]
6-00-66-4
Q1
Zahraj P.[10]
Stearns P.
3-66-16-4
Edmund K.[1]
Neff A.
3-66-26-4
Pinnington Jones J.[3]
Nanda G.
6-12-66-2
Langmo C.[4]
Claverie L.
6-777-656-1
Martin A.[5]
Jansen W.
6-36-747-5
Cassone M.
Kingsley C.[6]
6-33-67-64
Zink T.
Kirchheimer S.[7]
6-46-777-5
Papoe R.[8]
Kim A.
3-66-36-4
Hilderbrand T.
Corwin F.[9]
6-27-5
Braswell M.[11]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-23-67-5
Ghibaudo A.
Maloney P.[12]
6-16-4
Sheehy J.
Sharygin E.
6-06-1