Kyle Edmund vs Abedallah Shelbayh — Columbus CH Quarter-final

Columbus CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GBR
Kyle Edmund
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 September 2024
hard
JOR6
Abedallah Shelbayh
1442ELO
1448Hard ELO
22 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
Edmund K.
7-5 6-1
Shelbayh A.
Edmund K.
762
Shelbayh A.
510

Kyle Edmund defeated Abedallah Shelbayh 7-5 6-1 in the Columbus CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Abedallah Shelbayh came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Kyle Edmund came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Edmund K.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Shelbayh A.

Shelbayh A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Edmund K.

Serve advantage — Edmund K.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Edmund K.Shelbayh A.
1st serve in·Even
57%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (51 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Edmund K.Shelbayh A.
Clutch Rating·Even
32
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
74
Break points won·Slight edge
21
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
25
54
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
36
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Edmund K.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Shelbayh A.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
6.9
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
5.2
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Edmund K.Shelbayh A.
Freshness·
—
100

Shelbayh A.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Nakagawa N.
Trotter J.
7-685-77-65
Semi-finals
Nakagawa N.
Edmund K.
7-650-66-2
Trotter J.
Basavareddy N.
6-746-16-0
Quarter-finals
Nakagawa N.
Eubanks C.[1]
2-67-647-64
Edmund K.
Shelbayh A.[6]
7-56-1
Basavareddy N.
Boyer T.
6-06-2
Trotter J.
Escobedo E.
7-636-2
R16
Eubanks C.[1]
Andrade A.
6-37-5
Boyer T.
Kudla D.[5]
6-36-4
Shelbayh A.[6]
Anthrop J.
6-46-4
Escobedo E.
Galarneau A.[8]
6-46-4
Basavareddy N.
Quinn E.
5-77-56-2
Edmund K.
Stricker D.
6-36-3
Nakagawa N.
Bernard A.
6-26-3
Trotter J.
Zahraj P.
7-656-4
R32
Escobedo E.
Ghibaudo A.
6-746-26-4
Anthrop J.
Cassone M.
6-36-4
Bernard A.
Holt B.[7]
6-37-64
Andrade A.
Kuzuhara B.
6-16-3
Eubanks C.[1]
Williams C.
7-56-3
Zahraj P.
Schoolkate T.[2]
7-646-0
Quinn E.
Kypson P.[3]
6-46-4
Edmund K.
Wolf J.[4]
6-17-64
Kudla D.[5]
Braswell M.
4-66-16-2
Shelbayh A.[6]
Spizzirri E.
6-16-0
Galarneau A.[8]
Sweeny D.
6-46-1
Basavareddy N.
Marie J.
6-36-2
Boyer T.
Nakashima B.
6-17-63
Nakagawa N.
Pinnington Jones J.
7-616-4
Stricker D.
Peniston R.
6-37-5
Trotter J.
Mayo A.
4-66-26-2