Marc Polmans vs Vadym Ursu — Guangzhou CH Round of 32

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Marc Polmans
AUS
Marc Polmans
#344ATP
1449ELO
1414Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2024
hard
UKR
Vadym Ursu
#415ATP
1223ELO
1196Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Polmans M.
7-5 6-1
Ursu V.
Polmans M.
762
Ursu V.
510

Marc Polmans defeated Vadym Ursu 7-5 6-1 in the Guangzhou CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Marc Polmans came in ranked #344, defending last year's final.

Key context

  • Match story: Marc Polmans came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Polmans M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ursu V.

Ursu V.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Polmans M.

Serve advantage — Polmans M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Polmans M.Ursu V.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
41%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
55%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
54%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
3.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.0
5.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (78 vs 66). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Polmans M.Ursu V.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
23
0
Break points saved·Dominant
79
8
Break points won·Slight edge
10
18
Deciding sets·Even
31
27
Tiebreaks·
24
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Polmans M.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Ursu V.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.7+218 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.3Hard Elo 1196
7.8Overall Elo 1449
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1223
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
4.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Polmans M.Ursu V.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Polmans M.: 21 days rest · Ursu V.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Schoolkate T.
Walton A.[3]
6-33-66-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Shimabukuro S.
1-67-57-65
Semi-finals
Schoolkate T.
Cressy M.[7]
7-646-3
Walton A.[3]
Yunchaokete B.[5]
2-67-656-2
Oconnell C.[1]
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-46-2
Shimabukuro S.
Nardi L.[2]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.
Hsu Y.
3-66-47-5
Cressy M.[7]
Shimizu Y.
6-44-67-63
Walton A.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-35-77-5
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Duckworth J.[2]
7-646-3
Shimabukuro S.
Atmane T.[4]
7-6105-77-5
Oconnell C.[1]
Albot R.[5]
6-46-766-3
Nardi L.[2]
Polmans M.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.[3]
Gomez F.[7]
6-26-2
R16
Shimizu Y.
Jasika O.
7-57-5
Walton A.[3]
Bolt A.
7-606-1
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.
Holt B.
6-36-1
Schoolkate T.
Bellucci M.[8]
6-07-65
Cressy M.[7]
Lajal M.
6-33-66-3
Zhukayev B.
Te R.
7-57-63
Duckworth J.[2]
Berankis R.
6-16-1
Oconnell C.[1]
Mo Y.
6-22-1
Shimabukuro S.
Bai Y.
3-67-630-1
Albot R.[5]
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-36-2
Nardi L.[2]
Van Wyk K.
6-27-64
Kukushkin M.[3]
Svrcina D.
2-66-16-2
Atmane T.[4]
Leong M.
6-15-76-3
Gomez F.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Jubb P.[8]
6-36-1
R32
Schoolkate T.
Yevseyev D.
6-23-0
Lajal M.
Cui J.
4-66-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Cina F.
6-16-4
Zhukayev B.
Gerasimov E.
6-16-4
Berankis R.
Kachmazov A.
6-26-3
Holt B.
Purcell M.[1]
6-36-3
Hsu Y.
Bai Y.
6-26-3
Bellucci M.[8]
Tu L.
6-16-4
Shimizu Y.
Wong C.
6-36-2
Jasika O.
Wang J.
6-36-1
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-36-3
Te R.
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-46-4
Bolt A.
Marchenko I.
6-44-66-1
Walton A.[3]
Zhou Y.
4-67-56-3
Escoffier A.
Noguchi R.
6-16-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Sweeny D.
0-66-36-2
Leong M.
Uchida K.
4-66-26-2
Polmans M.
Ursu V.
7-56-1
Svrcina D.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-4
Oconnell C.[1]
Lamasine T.
6-36-2
Nardi L.[2]
Cui J.
6-43-67-64
Kukushkin M.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-46-4
Atmane T.[4]
Noguchi R.
6-36-4
Albot R.[5]
Zeng Y.
6-46-727-5
Shimabukuro S.
Cressy M.[6]
7-6106-3
Gomez F.[7]
Gerasimov E.
6-47-5
Jubb P.[8]
Xiao L.
6-36-4
Bai Y.
Mott B.
6-26-4
Mccabe J.
Agarwal R.
6-26-4
Mo Y.
Kalovelonis M.
6-27-5
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
Zakharov A.
6-46-4
Van Wyk K.
Kachmazov A.
7-656-4