Sho Shimabukuro vs Luca Nardi — Guangzhou CH Semi-final

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Sho Shimabukuro
JPN
Sho Shimabukuro
#95ATP
1672ELO
1606Hard ELO
$268kYTD
$1.0MCAREER
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2024
hard
ITA2
Luca Nardi
#160ATP
1585ELO
1572Hard ELO
$213kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
Shimabukuro S.
6-2 6-4
Nardi L.
Shimabukuro S.
662
Nardi L.
240

Sho Shimabukuro defeated Luca Nardi 6-2 6-4 in the Guangzhou CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Sho Shimabukuro came in ranked #95.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Shimabukuro S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nardi L.

Nardi L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Shimabukuro S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Shimabukuro S.Nardi L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.7
3.4
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (150 vs 139). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Shimabukuro S.Nardi L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
42
32
Break points saved·Even
88
92
Break points won·Clear edge
31
15
Deciding sets·Slight edge
50
42
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
38
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Shimabukuro S.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Nardi L.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 42 days (−1.0)
Form & Matchup
4.8+34 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.2Hard Elo 1572
4.9Overall Elo 1672
ELO gap
5.1Overall Elo 1585
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
8.3
Surface form
3.8
9.05-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
5.4
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Shimabukuro S.Nardi L.
Freshness·Slight edge
96
90

Shimabukuro S.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Nardi L.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Schoolkate T.
Walton A.[3]
6-33-66-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Shimabukuro S.
1-67-57-65
Semi-finals
Schoolkate T.
Cressy M.[7]
7-646-3
Walton A.[3]
Yunchaokete B.[5]
2-67-656-2
Oconnell C.[1]
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-46-2
Shimabukuro S.
Nardi L.[2]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.
Hsu Y.
3-66-47-5
Cressy M.[7]
Shimizu Y.
6-44-67-63
Walton A.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-35-77-5
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Duckworth J.[2]
7-646-3
Shimabukuro S.
Atmane T.[4]
7-6105-77-5
Oconnell C.[1]
Albot R.[5]
6-46-766-3
Nardi L.[2]
Polmans M.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.[3]
Gomez F.[7]
6-26-2
R16
Shimizu Y.
Jasika O.
7-57-5
Walton A.[3]
Bolt A.
7-606-1
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.
Holt B.
6-36-1
Schoolkate T.
Bellucci M.[8]
6-07-65
Cressy M.[7]
Lajal M.
6-33-66-3
Zhukayev B.
Te R.
7-57-63
Duckworth J.[2]
Berankis R.
6-16-1
Oconnell C.[1]
Mo Y.
6-22-1
Shimabukuro S.
Bai Y.
3-67-630-1
Albot R.[5]
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-36-2
Nardi L.[2]
Van Wyk K.
6-27-64
Kukushkin M.[3]
Svrcina D.
2-66-16-2
Atmane T.[4]
Leong M.
6-15-76-3
Gomez F.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Jubb P.[8]
6-36-1
R32
Schoolkate T.
Yevseyev D.
6-23-0
Lajal M.
Cui J.
4-66-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Cina F.
6-16-4
Zhukayev B.
Gerasimov E.
6-16-4
Berankis R.
Kachmazov A.
6-26-3
Holt B.
Purcell M.[1]
6-36-3
Hsu Y.
Bai Y.
6-26-3
Bellucci M.[8]
Tu L.
6-16-4
Shimizu Y.
Wong C.
6-36-2
Jasika O.
Wang J.
6-36-1
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-36-3
Te R.
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-46-4
Bolt A.
Marchenko I.
6-44-66-1
Walton A.[3]
Zhou Y.
4-67-56-3
Escoffier A.
Noguchi R.
6-16-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Sweeny D.
0-66-36-2
Leong M.
Uchida K.
4-66-26-2
Polmans M.
Ursu V.
7-56-1
Svrcina D.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-4
Oconnell C.[1]
Lamasine T.
6-36-2
Nardi L.[2]
Cui J.
6-43-67-64
Kukushkin M.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-46-4
Atmane T.[4]
Noguchi R.
6-36-4
Albot R.[5]
Zeng Y.
6-46-727-5
Shimabukuro S.
Cressy M.[6]
7-6106-3
Gomez F.[7]
Gerasimov E.
6-47-5
Jubb P.[8]
Xiao L.
6-36-4
Bai Y.
Mott B.
6-26-4
Mccabe J.
Agarwal R.
6-26-4
Mo Y.
Kalovelonis M.
6-27-5
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
Zakharov A.
6-46-4
Van Wyk K.
Kachmazov A.
7-656-4