Pengyu Lu vs Seita Watanabe — Guangzhou CH Qualifying Round 1

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
CHN
Pengyu Lu
#1247ATP
24 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2024
hard
JPN12
Seita Watanabe
#1705ATP
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Lu P.
7-5 6-3
Watanabe S.
Lu P.
762
Watanabe S.
530

Pengyu Lu defeated Seita Watanabe 7-5 6-3 in the Guangzhou CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Pengyu Lu closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lu P.serving53% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Watanabe S.

Watanabe S.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Lu P.

Serve advantage — Watanabe S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lu P.Watanabe S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
53%
60%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
51%
65%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
32%
44%
Service points won·Clear edge
42%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
27%
38%
Break points saved·Clear edge
36%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.4
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (5 vs 32). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Lu P.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Watanabe S.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
9.2
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Moriya H.[9]
Donskoy E.[4]
6-46-2
Bai Y.[10]
Shimizu Y.[2]
6-46-0
Gerasimov E.[8]
Sekulic P.[1]
1-66-37-64
Cui J.
Ellis B.
6-736-36-2
Noguchi R.[5]
Echargui M.[7]
6-42-66-2
Berankis R.[6]
Erel Y.[11]
6-47-64
Kalovelonis M.
Haliak M.[3]
6-25-4
Donskoy E.[1]
Lu P.
6-06-1
Van Wyk K.[2]
Fancutt T.[10]
6-36-2
Trongcharoenchaikul W.[7]
Chen C.
7-656-3
Leong M.[8]
Dong Z.
4-66-27-5
Agarwal R.[9]
Liu H.
6-37-63
Q1
Gerasimov E.[8]
Bondioli F.
6-27-67
Donskoy E.[4]
Bertola R.
6-46-4
Echargui M.[7]
Trotter J.
7-627-5
Ellis B.
Saville L.[3]
6-46-1
Berankis R.[6]
Ramanathan R.
6-23-66-1
Moriya H.[9]
Xiao L.
6-36-0
Shimizu Y.[2]
Palan D.
6-46-4
Sekulic P.[1]
Fenty A.
6-46-1
Bai Y.[10]
Yang Z.
6-16-0
Cui J.
Majchrzak K.[12]
6-26-3
Noguchi R.[5]
Haliak M.
4-66-47-64
Erel Y.[11]
Sun F.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.[1]
Zhang L.
6-26-1
Agarwal R.[9]
Romios M.
6-32-0
Van Wyk K.[2]
Kawachi K.
6-46-0
Haliak M.[3]
Denisov I.
7-53-66-3
Liu H.
Takahashi Y.[4]
2-67-642-1
Chen C.
Chappell N.[6]
6-24-4
Trongcharoenchaikul W.[7]
Matsui T.
6-26-4
Leong M.[8]
Zheng Z.
6-46-1
Fancutt T.[10]
Li W.
6-46-4
Kalovelonis M.
Yang J.[11]
7-647-5
Lu P.
Watanabe S.[12]
7-56-3
Dong Z.
Yuzuki T.
7-57-5