Gerard Campana Lee vs Rudolf Molleker — Szczecin CH Quarter-final

Szczecin CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
KOR
Gerard Campana Lee
#632ATP
21 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2024
clay
Rudolf Molleker
GER
Rudolf Molleker
#482ATP
1387ELO
1382Clay ELO
25 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWW
Campana Lee G.
5-7 7-5 6-4
Molleker R.
Campana Lee G.
5762
Molleker R.
7541

Gerard Campana Lee defeated Rudolf Molleker 5-7 7-5 6-4 in the Szczecin CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Rudolf Molleker came in ranked #482, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Campana Lee G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Molleker R.

Molleker R.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Campana Lee G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Campana Lee G.Molleker R.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.9
5.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (103 vs 118). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Campana Lee G.Molleker R.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
0
8
Break points saved·Dominant
18
69
Break points won·Dominant
51
12
Deciding sets·Even
4
4
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
15
21

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Campana Lee G.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Molleker R.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.7
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
4.0
Minutes 14d
5.6
4.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Campana Lee G.Molleker R.
Freshness·Even
65
66

Campana Lee G.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 63 games (7d) · Molleker R.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 60 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kopriva V.[5]
Pellegrino A.
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Kopriva V.[5]
Coria F.[2]
5-77-57-64
Pellegrino A.
Campana Lee G.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Kopriva V.[5]
Vatutin A.
6-41-66-4
Coria F.[2]
Berrettini J.
7-57-5
Pellegrino A.
Altmaier D.[4]
7-56-1
Campana Lee G.
Molleker R.
5-77-56-4
R16
Coria F.[2]
Arnaboldi F.
6-17-65
Altmaier D.[4]
Andreev A.
4-66-36-4
Kopriva V.[5]
Fanselow S.
6-36-0
Berrettini J.
Choinski J.
7-56-3
Campana Lee G.
Debru G.
3-67-56-4
Molleker R.
Novak D.
6-46-2
Pellegrino A.
Mager G.
6-23-67-61
Vatutin A.
Vrbensky M.
6-36-2
R32
Fanselow S.
Paulson A.
6-30-0
Vatutin A.
Popko D.
6-45-77-62
Vrbensky M.
Munar J.[3]
6-36-4
Debru G.
Seyboth Wild T.[1]
6-37-65
Coria F.[2]
Pieczkowski O.
6-06-3
Altmaier D.[4]
Michalski D.
7-636-2
Kopriva V.[5]
Moreno De Alboran N.
2-67-56-1
Molleker R.
Ramos A.[6]
6-27-66
Pellegrino A.
Galan D.[7]
6-36-2
Berrettini J.
Napolitano S.[8]
3-66-26-4
Andreev A.
Gerch L.
3-66-46-3
Arnaboldi F.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-37-66
Campana Lee G.
Cachin P.
6-46-3
Choinski J.
Barton H.
4-66-06-4
Mager G.
Rehberg M.
6-33-66-1
Novak D.
Berkieta T.
6-36-3