Christopher Oconnell vs Tristan Lamasine — Guangzhou CH Round of 32

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS1
Christopher Oconnell
1673ELO
1657Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2024
hard
FRA
Tristan Lamasine
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLWWLL
Oconnell C.
6-3 6-2
Lamasine T.
Oconnell C.
662
Lamasine T.
320

Christopher Oconnell defeated Tristan Lamasine 6-3 6-2 in the Guangzhou CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Christopher Oconnell came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Oconnell C.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lamasine T.

Lamasine T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Oconnell C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Oconnell C.Lamasine T.
20
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Oconnell C.Lamasine T.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.4
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (127 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Oconnell C.Lamasine T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
21
Break points saved·Dominant
98
38
Break points won·Slight edge
22
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
38
51
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Oconnell C.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lamasine T.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.9
Surface form
5.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.9
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Schoolkate T.
Walton A.[3]
6-33-66-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Shimabukuro S.
1-67-57-65
Semi-finals
Schoolkate T.
Cressy M.[7]
7-646-3
Walton A.[3]
Yunchaokete B.[5]
2-67-656-2
Oconnell C.[1]
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-46-2
Shimabukuro S.
Nardi L.[2]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.
Hsu Y.
3-66-47-5
Cressy M.[7]
Shimizu Y.
6-44-67-63
Walton A.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-35-77-5
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Duckworth J.[2]
7-646-3
Shimabukuro S.
Atmane T.[4]
7-6105-77-5
Oconnell C.[1]
Albot R.[5]
6-46-766-3
Nardi L.[2]
Polmans M.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.[3]
Gomez F.[7]
6-26-2
R16
Shimizu Y.
Jasika O.
7-57-5
Walton A.[3]
Bolt A.
7-606-1
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.
Holt B.
6-36-1
Schoolkate T.
Bellucci M.[8]
6-07-65
Cressy M.[7]
Lajal M.
6-33-66-3
Zhukayev B.
Te R.
7-57-63
Duckworth J.[2]
Berankis R.
6-16-1
Oconnell C.[1]
Mo Y.
6-22-1
Shimabukuro S.
Bai Y.
3-67-630-1
Albot R.[5]
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-36-2
Nardi L.[2]
Van Wyk K.
6-27-64
Kukushkin M.[3]
Svrcina D.
2-66-16-2
Atmane T.[4]
Leong M.
6-15-76-3
Gomez F.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Jubb P.[8]
6-36-1
R32
Schoolkate T.
Yevseyev D.
6-23-0
Lajal M.
Cui J.
4-66-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Cina F.
6-16-4
Zhukayev B.
Gerasimov E.
6-16-4
Berankis R.
Kachmazov A.
6-26-3
Holt B.
Purcell M.[1]
6-36-3
Hsu Y.
Bai Y.
6-26-3
Bellucci M.[8]
Tu L.
6-16-4
Shimizu Y.
Wong C.
6-36-2
Jasika O.
Wang J.
6-36-1
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-36-3
Te R.
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-46-4
Bolt A.
Marchenko I.
6-44-66-1
Walton A.[3]
Zhou Y.
4-67-56-3
Escoffier A.
Noguchi R.
6-16-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Sweeny D.
0-66-36-2
Leong M.
Uchida K.
4-66-26-2
Polmans M.
Ursu V.
7-56-1
Svrcina D.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-4
Oconnell C.[1]
Lamasine T.
6-36-2
Nardi L.[2]
Cui J.
6-43-67-64
Kukushkin M.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-46-4
Atmane T.[4]
Noguchi R.
6-36-4
Albot R.[5]
Zeng Y.
6-46-727-5
Shimabukuro S.
Cressy M.[6]
7-6106-3
Gomez F.[7]
Gerasimov E.
6-47-5
Jubb P.[8]
Xiao L.
6-36-4
Bai Y.
Mott B.
6-26-4
Mccabe J.
Agarwal R.
6-26-4
Mo Y.
Kalovelonis M.
6-27-5
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
Zakharov A.
6-46-4
Van Wyk K.
Kachmazov A.
7-656-4