Kris Van Wyk vs Thomas Fancutt — Guangzhou CH Qualifying Round 2

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
RSA2
Kris Van Wyk
#853ATP
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2024
hard
Thomas Fancutt
AUS10
Thomas Fancutt
#851ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLW
Van Wyk K.
6-3 6-2
Fancutt T.
Van Wyk K.
662
Fancutt T.
320

Kris Van Wyk defeated Thomas Fancutt 6-3 6-2 in the Guangzhou CH qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van Wyk K.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Fancutt T.

Fancutt T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Van Wyk K.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Wyk K.Fancutt T.
1st serve in·Even
55%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
8.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
5.3
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Van Wyk K.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fancutt T.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
2.8
Fatigue & Travel
0.0
Minutes 14d
4.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Van Wyk K.Fancutt T.
Freshness·
—
76

Fancutt T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Moriya H.[9]
Donskoy E.[4]
6-46-2
Bai Y.[10]
Shimizu Y.[2]
6-46-0
Gerasimov E.[8]
Sekulic P.[1]
1-66-37-64
Cui J.
Ellis B.
6-736-36-2
Noguchi R.[5]
Echargui M.[7]
6-42-66-2
Berankis R.[6]
Erel Y.[11]
6-47-64
Kalovelonis M.
Haliak M.[3]
6-25-4
Donskoy E.[1]
Lu P.
6-06-1
Van Wyk K.[2]
Fancutt T.[10]
6-36-2
Trongcharoenchaikul W.[7]
Chen C.
7-656-3
Leong M.[8]
Dong Z.
4-66-27-5
Agarwal R.[9]
Liu H.
6-37-63
Q1
Gerasimov E.[8]
Bondioli F.
6-27-67
Donskoy E.[4]
Bertola R.
6-46-4
Echargui M.[7]
Trotter J.
7-627-5
Ellis B.
Saville L.[3]
6-46-1
Berankis R.[6]
Ramanathan R.
6-23-66-1
Moriya H.[9]
Xiao L.
6-36-0
Shimizu Y.[2]
Palan D.
6-46-4
Sekulic P.[1]
Fenty A.
6-46-1
Bai Y.[10]
Yang Z.
6-16-0
Cui J.
Majchrzak K.[12]
6-26-3
Noguchi R.[5]
Haliak M.
4-66-47-64
Erel Y.[11]
Sun F.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.[1]
Zhang L.
6-26-1
Agarwal R.[9]
Romios M.
6-32-0
Van Wyk K.[2]
Kawachi K.
6-46-0
Haliak M.[3]
Denisov I.
7-53-66-3
Liu H.
Takahashi Y.[4]
2-67-642-1
Chen C.
Chappell N.[6]
6-24-4
Trongcharoenchaikul W.[7]
Matsui T.
6-26-4
Leong M.[8]
Zheng Z.
6-46-1
Fancutt T.[10]
Li W.
6-46-4
Kalovelonis M.
Yang J.[11]
7-647-5
Lu P.
Watanabe S.[12]
7-56-3
Dong Z.
Yuzuki T.
7-57-5