Quentin Halys vs Martin Damm — Rennes CH Round of 32

Rennes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Quentin Halys
FRA4
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2024
hard
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Halys Q.
6-7 7-6 6-2
Damm M.
Halys Q.
657762
Damm M.
776421

Quentin Halys defeated Martin Damm 6-7 7-6 6-2 in the Rennes CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Damm M.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Halys Q.Damm M.
35
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Damm M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
78%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
68%
Return points won·Even
34%
33%
Break points saved·Even
65%
66%
Aces / match·Clear edge
10.7
12.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 105). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Halys Q.Damm M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
26
Break points saved·Even
97
93
Break points won·Even
4
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
75
5
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
91
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Halys Q.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Damm M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.3+20 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.7Hard Elo 1657
5.1Overall Elo 1707
ELO gap
4.9Overall Elo 1706
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.4
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Damm M.
Freshness·Even
92
92

Halys Q.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Damm M.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Fearnley J.
Halys Q.[4]
0-67-656-3
Semi-finals
Fearnley J.
Mayot H.[3]
6-46-2
Halys Q.[4]
Lestienne C.[2]
6-47-64
Quarter-finals
Halys Q.[4]
Droguet T.[6]
7-6116-1
Fearnley J.
Mannarino A.[1]
6-36-3
Mayot H.[3]
Geerts M.
6-26-4
Lestienne C.[2]
Pouille L.[7]
3-66-37-64
R16
Halys Q.[4]
Martineau M.
7-627-62
Mayot H.[3]
Bouquier A.
6-46-3
Mannarino A.[1]
Basilashvili N.
7-653-66-3
Fearnley J.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
1-66-26-4
Geerts M.
Bonzi B.[5]
6-46-4
Droguet T.[6]
Grenier H.
3-67-637-5
Pouille L.[7]
Escoffier A.
6-36-3
Lestienne C.[2]
Marie J.
7-56-1
R32
Halys Q.[4]
Damm M.
6-757-646-2
Geerts M.
Lokoli L.
6-24-2
Grenier H.
De Schepper K.
7-616-3
Bonzi B.[5]
Naw H.
6-34-66-4
Mannarino A.[1]
Bourgue M.
6-16-2
Basilashvili N.
Wiskandt M.
6-43-66-3
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-4
Fearnley J.
Paire B.
6-16-0
Mayot H.[3]
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Bouquier A.
Furness E.
2-67-656-4
Droguet T.[6]
Diez S.
6-36-4
Martineau M.
Coulibaly E.
6-06-1
Pouille L.[7]
Hemery C.
6-36-4
Escoffier A.
Broady L.
7-644-67-65
Marie J.
Masur D.
4-66-27-5
Lestienne C.[2]
Bertrand R.
2-66-36-3