Michael Geerts vs Benjamin Bonzi — Rennes CH Round of 16

Rennes CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#333ATP
1400ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2024
hard
Benjamin Bonzi
FRA5
Benjamin Bonzi
#93ATP
1749ELO
1713Hard ELO
$396kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWL
Geerts M.
6-4 6-4
Bonzi B.
Geerts M.
662
Bonzi B.
440

Michael Geerts defeated Benjamin Bonzi 6-4 6-4 in the Rennes CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Benjamin Bonzi came in ranked #93, defending last year's final.

Key context

  • Match story: Michael Geerts edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Geerts M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bonzi B.

Bonzi B.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Geerts M.Bonzi B.
—
Serve
27
—
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Geerts M.Bonzi B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.1
5.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (134 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Geerts M.Bonzi B.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
9
65
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
96
Break points won·Clear edge
3
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
8
77
Tiebreaks·Dominant
2
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Geerts M.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Bonzi B.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
0.9Hard Elo 1383
Surface ELO
9.1+330 Hard Elo edge
0.7Overall Elo 1400
ELO gap
9.3Overall Elo 1749
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
8.5
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Geerts M.Bonzi B.
Freshness·
—
92

Bonzi B.: 10 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Fearnley J.
Halys Q.[4]
0-67-656-3
Semi-finals
Fearnley J.
Mayot H.[3]
6-46-2
Halys Q.[4]
Lestienne C.[2]
6-47-64
Quarter-finals
Halys Q.[4]
Droguet T.[6]
7-6116-1
Fearnley J.
Mannarino A.[1]
6-36-3
Mayot H.[3]
Geerts M.
6-26-4
Lestienne C.[2]
Pouille L.[7]
3-66-37-64
R16
Halys Q.[4]
Martineau M.
7-627-62
Mayot H.[3]
Bouquier A.
6-46-3
Mannarino A.[1]
Basilashvili N.
7-653-66-3
Fearnley J.
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
1-66-26-4
Geerts M.
Bonzi B.[5]
6-46-4
Droguet T.[6]
Grenier H.
3-67-637-5
Pouille L.[7]
Escoffier A.
6-36-3
Lestienne C.[2]
Marie J.
7-56-1
R32
Halys Q.[4]
Damm M.
6-757-646-2
Geerts M.
Lokoli L.
6-24-2
Grenier H.
De Schepper K.
7-616-3
Bonzi B.[5]
Naw H.
6-34-66-4
Mannarino A.[1]
Bourgue M.
6-16-2
Basilashvili N.
Wiskandt M.
6-43-66-3
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-4
Fearnley J.
Paire B.
6-16-0
Mayot H.[3]
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Bouquier A.
Furness E.
2-67-656-4
Droguet T.[6]
Diez S.
6-36-4
Martineau M.
Coulibaly E.
6-06-1
Pouille L.[7]
Hemery C.
6-36-4
Escoffier A.
Broady L.
7-644-67-65
Marie J.
Masur D.
4-66-27-5
Lestienne C.[2]
Bertrand R.
2-66-36-3