Radu Albot vs Yaojie Zeng — Guangzhou CH Round of 32

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Radu Albot
MDA5
Radu Albot
#490ATP
1453ELO
1429Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2024
hard
CHN
Yaojie Zeng
#893ATP
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
Albot R.
6-4 6-7 7-5
Zeng Y.
Albot R.
66272
Zeng Y.
47751

Radu Albot defeated Yaojie Zeng 6-4 6-7 7-5 in the Guangzhou CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Albot R.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Zeng Y.

Zeng Y.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Albot R.

Serve advantage — Albot R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Albot R.Zeng Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
52%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.9
7.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 15). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Albot R.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Zeng Y.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 140 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.4
Surface form
1.6
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Albot R.Zeng Y.
Freshness·
91
—

Albot R.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Schoolkate T.
Walton A.[3]
6-33-66-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Shimabukuro S.
1-67-57-65
Semi-finals
Schoolkate T.
Cressy M.[7]
7-646-3
Walton A.[3]
Yunchaokete B.[5]
2-67-656-2
Oconnell C.[1]
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-46-2
Shimabukuro S.
Nardi L.[2]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.
Hsu Y.
3-66-47-5
Cressy M.[7]
Shimizu Y.
6-44-67-63
Walton A.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-35-77-5
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Duckworth J.[2]
7-646-3
Shimabukuro S.
Atmane T.[4]
7-6105-77-5
Oconnell C.[1]
Albot R.[5]
6-46-766-3
Nardi L.[2]
Polmans M.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.[3]
Gomez F.[7]
6-26-2
R16
Shimizu Y.
Jasika O.
7-57-5
Walton A.[3]
Bolt A.
7-606-1
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.
Holt B.
6-36-1
Schoolkate T.
Bellucci M.[8]
6-07-65
Cressy M.[7]
Lajal M.
6-33-66-3
Zhukayev B.
Te R.
7-57-63
Duckworth J.[2]
Berankis R.
6-16-1
Oconnell C.[1]
Mo Y.
6-22-1
Shimabukuro S.
Bai Y.
3-67-630-1
Albot R.[5]
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-36-2
Nardi L.[2]
Van Wyk K.
6-27-64
Kukushkin M.[3]
Svrcina D.
2-66-16-2
Atmane T.[4]
Leong M.
6-15-76-3
Gomez F.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Jubb P.[8]
6-36-1
R32
Schoolkate T.
Yevseyev D.
6-23-0
Lajal M.
Cui J.
4-66-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Cina F.
6-16-4
Zhukayev B.
Gerasimov E.
6-16-4
Berankis R.
Kachmazov A.
6-26-3
Holt B.
Purcell M.[1]
6-36-3
Hsu Y.
Bai Y.
6-26-3
Bellucci M.[8]
Tu L.
6-16-4
Shimizu Y.
Wong C.
6-36-2
Jasika O.
Wang J.
6-36-1
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-36-3
Te R.
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-46-4
Bolt A.
Marchenko I.
6-44-66-1
Walton A.[3]
Zhou Y.
4-67-56-3
Escoffier A.
Noguchi R.
6-16-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Sweeny D.
0-66-36-2
Leong M.
Uchida K.
4-66-26-2
Polmans M.
Ursu V.
7-56-1
Svrcina D.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-4
Oconnell C.[1]
Lamasine T.
6-36-2
Nardi L.[2]
Cui J.
6-43-67-64
Kukushkin M.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-46-4
Atmane T.[4]
Noguchi R.
6-36-4
Albot R.[5]
Zeng Y.
6-46-727-5
Shimabukuro S.
Cressy M.[6]
7-6106-3
Gomez F.[7]
Gerasimov E.
6-47-5
Jubb P.[8]
Xiao L.
6-36-4
Bai Y.
Mott B.
6-26-4
Mccabe J.
Agarwal R.
6-26-4
Mo Y.
Kalovelonis M.
6-27-5
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
Zakharov A.
6-46-4
Van Wyk K.
Kachmazov A.
7-656-4