Rishab Agarwal vs Matthew Christopher Romios — Guangzhou CH Qualifying Round 1

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
IND9
Rishab Agarwal
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 9 September 2024
hard
AUS
Matthew Christopher Romios
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Agarwal R.
6-3 2-0
Romios M.
Agarwal R.
62–
Romios M.
30–

Rishab Agarwal advanced when Matthew Christopher Romios retired 6-3 2-0 in the Guangzhou CH qualifying round 1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Agarwal R.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Romios M.

Romios M.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Agarwal R.

Serve advantage — Agarwal R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Agarwal R.Romios M.
1st serve in·Clear edge
49%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
43%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
29%
Break points saved·Slight edge
52%
45%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.0
7.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (4 vs 7). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Agarwal R.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 728 days (−1.5)
Romios M.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
2.8
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Moriya H.[9]
Donskoy E.[4]
6-46-2
Bai Y.[10]
Shimizu Y.[2]
6-46-0
Gerasimov E.[8]
Sekulic P.[1]
1-66-37-64
Cui J.
Ellis B.
6-736-36-2
Noguchi R.[5]
Echargui M.[7]
6-42-66-2
Berankis R.[6]
Erel Y.[11]
6-47-64
Kalovelonis M.
Haliak M.[3]
6-25-4
Donskoy E.[1]
Lu P.
6-06-1
Van Wyk K.[2]
Fancutt T.[10]
6-36-2
Trongcharoenchaikul W.[7]
Chen C.
7-656-3
Leong M.[8]
Dong Z.
4-66-27-5
Agarwal R.[9]
Liu H.
6-37-63
Q1
Gerasimov E.[8]
Bondioli F.
6-27-67
Donskoy E.[4]
Bertola R.
6-46-4
Echargui M.[7]
Trotter J.
7-627-5
Ellis B.
Saville L.[3]
6-46-1
Berankis R.[6]
Ramanathan R.
6-23-66-1
Moriya H.[9]
Xiao L.
6-36-0
Shimizu Y.[2]
Palan D.
6-46-4
Sekulic P.[1]
Fenty A.
6-46-1
Bai Y.[10]
Yang Z.
6-16-0
Cui J.
Majchrzak K.[12]
6-26-3
Noguchi R.[5]
Haliak M.
4-66-47-64
Erel Y.[11]
Sun F.
6-36-4
Donskoy E.[1]
Zhang L.
6-26-1
Agarwal R.[9]
Romios M.
6-32-0
Van Wyk K.[2]
Kawachi K.
6-46-0
Haliak M.[3]
Denisov I.
7-53-66-3
Liu H.
Takahashi Y.[4]
2-67-642-1
Chen C.
Chappell N.[6]
6-24-4
Trongcharoenchaikul W.[7]
Matsui T.
6-26-4
Leong M.[8]
Zheng Z.
6-46-1
Fancutt T.[10]
Li W.
6-46-4
Kalovelonis M.
Yang J.[11]
7-647-5
Lu P.
Watanabe S.[12]
7-56-3
Dong Z.
Yuzuki T.
7-57-5