James Mccabe vs Rishab Agarwal — Guangzhou CH Round of 32

Guangzhou CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
James Mccabe
#242ATP
1532ELO
1481Hard ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2024
hard
IND
Rishab Agarwal
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWL
Mccabe J.
6-2 6-4
Agarwal R.
Mccabe J.
662
Agarwal R.
240

James Mccabe defeated Rishab Agarwal 6-2 6-4 in the Guangzhou CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mccabe J.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Agarwal R.

Agarwal R.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mccabe J.

Serve advantage — Agarwal R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mccabe J.Agarwal R.
1st serve in·Clear edge
61%
49%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
55%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
42%
Break points saved·Even
60%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
4.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 4). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Mccabe J.
4.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Agarwal R.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 728 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Mccabe J.Agarwal R.
Freshness·
95
—

Mccabe J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Schoolkate T.
Walton A.[3]
6-33-66-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Shimabukuro S.
1-67-57-65
Semi-finals
Schoolkate T.
Cressy M.[7]
7-646-3
Walton A.[3]
Yunchaokete B.[5]
2-67-656-2
Oconnell C.[1]
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-46-2
Shimabukuro S.
Nardi L.[2]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Schoolkate T.
Hsu Y.
3-66-47-5
Cressy M.[7]
Shimizu Y.
6-44-67-63
Walton A.[3]
Zhukayev B.
6-35-77-5
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Duckworth J.[2]
7-646-3
Shimabukuro S.
Atmane T.[4]
7-6105-77-5
Oconnell C.[1]
Albot R.[5]
6-46-766-3
Nardi L.[2]
Polmans M.
6-46-3
Kukushkin M.[3]
Gomez F.[7]
6-26-2
R16
Shimizu Y.
Jasika O.
7-57-5
Walton A.[3]
Bolt A.
7-606-1
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Escoffier A.
6-46-4
Hsu Y.
Holt B.
6-36-1
Schoolkate T.
Bellucci M.[8]
6-07-65
Cressy M.[7]
Lajal M.
6-33-66-3
Zhukayev B.
Te R.
7-57-63
Duckworth J.[2]
Berankis R.
6-16-1
Oconnell C.[1]
Mo Y.
6-22-1
Shimabukuro S.
Bai Y.
3-67-630-1
Albot R.[5]
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
6-36-2
Nardi L.[2]
Van Wyk K.
6-27-64
Kukushkin M.[3]
Svrcina D.
2-66-16-2
Atmane T.[4]
Leong M.
6-15-76-3
Gomez F.[7]
Mccabe J.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Jubb P.[8]
6-36-1
R32
Schoolkate T.
Yevseyev D.
6-23-0
Lajal M.
Cui J.
4-66-16-4
Yunchaokete B.[5]
Cina F.
6-16-4
Zhukayev B.
Gerasimov E.
6-16-4
Berankis R.
Kachmazov A.
6-26-3
Holt B.
Purcell M.[1]
6-36-3
Hsu Y.
Bai Y.
6-26-3
Bellucci M.[8]
Tu L.
6-16-4
Shimizu Y.
Wong C.
6-36-2
Jasika O.
Wang J.
6-36-1
Cressy M.[7]
Moriya H.
6-36-3
Te R.
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-46-4
Bolt A.
Marchenko I.
6-44-66-1
Walton A.[3]
Zhou Y.
4-67-56-3
Escoffier A.
Noguchi R.
6-16-3
Duckworth J.[2]
Sweeny D.
0-66-36-2
Leong M.
Uchida K.
4-66-26-2
Polmans M.
Ursu V.
7-56-1
Svrcina D.
Uchiyama Y.
7-56-4
Oconnell C.[1]
Lamasine T.
6-36-2
Nardi L.[2]
Cui J.
6-43-67-64
Kukushkin M.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-46-4
Atmane T.[4]
Noguchi R.
6-36-4
Albot R.[5]
Zeng Y.
6-46-727-5
Shimabukuro S.
Cressy M.[6]
7-6106-3
Gomez F.[7]
Gerasimov E.
6-47-5
Jubb P.[8]
Xiao L.
6-36-4
Bai Y.
Mott B.
6-26-4
Mccabe J.
Agarwal R.
6-26-4
Mo Y.
Kalovelonis M.
6-27-5
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
Zakharov A.
6-46-4
Van Wyk K.
Kachmazov A.
7-656-4