Beibit Zhukayev vs Ajeet Rai — Shanghai CH Round of 32

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
KAZ
Beibit Zhukayev
#387ATP
1455ELO
1402Hard ELO
25 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 September 2024
hard
NZL
Ajeet Rai
#992ATP
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
Zhukayev B.
2-6 6-3 7-6
Rai A.
Zhukayev B.
26772
Rai A.
63631

Beibit Zhukayev defeated Ajeet Rai 2-6 6-3 7-6 in the Shanghai CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhukayev B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Rai A.

Rai A.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zhukayev B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zhukayev B.Rai A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Even
33%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.3
6.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhukayev B.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Rai A.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
5.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
5.0
7.0
3-set count
4.0
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zhukayev B.Rai A.
Freshness·
—
85

Rai A.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 24 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Shimabukuro S.
Hsu Y.[9]
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Hsu Y.[9]
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Shimabukuro S.
Wong C.[4]
6-37-62
Quarter-finals
Hsu Y.[9]
Van Wyk K.
7-642-66-2
Gombos N.
Kachmazov A.
6-727-636-4
Wong C.[4]
Zhukayev B.
7-666-3
Shimabukuro S.
Svrcina D.
6-47-5
R16
Hsu Y.[9]
Watanuki Y.
2-66-44-0
Van Wyk K.
Gomez F.
6-46-4
Gombos N.
Polmans M.
6-46-2
Kachmazov A.
Cressy M.[8]
4-67-636-3
Zhukayev B.
Barrios Vera T.[7]
7-646-727-5
Wong C.[4]
Peniston R.
6-26-3
Svrcina D.
Hong S.[5]
7-56-3
Shimabukuro S.
Atmane T.[2]
6-46-3
R32
Van Wyk K.
Garin C.[1]
6-36-1
Hsu Y.[9]
Wu Y.
6-753-3
Barrios Vera T.[7]
Sun F.
6-47-5
Shimabukuro S.
Bai Y.
7-56-3
Gomez F.
Noguchi R.
7-57-64
Zhukayev B.
Rai A.
2-66-37-63
Watanuki Y.
Te R.
6-47-5
Polmans M.
Yunchaokete B.[3]
6-33-66-3
Gombos N.
Jubb P.
6-46-2
Kachmazov A.
Fatic N.
6-37-67
Cressy M.[8]
Mott B.
6-16-1
Peniston R.
Zhou Y.
6-46-2
Wong C.[4]
Gerasimov E.
7-646-1
Hong S.[5]
Wu T.
6-726-46-4
Svrcina D.
Mejia N.
6-16-1
Atmane T.[2]
Lajal M.
7-641-66-1