Marko Topo vs Zsombor Piros — Tulln CH Round of 32

Tulln CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Marko Topo
#350ATP
1463ELO
1399Clay ELO
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 September 2024
clay
Zsombor Piros
HUN4
Zsombor Piros
#169ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWL
Topo M.
6-4 7-6
Piros Z.
Topo M.
6772
Piros Z.
4650

Marko Topo defeated Zsombor Piros 6-4 7-6 in the Tulln CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Topo M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Piros Z.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Topo M.

Serve advantage — Piros Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Topo M.Piros Z.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
65%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 138). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Topo M.Piros Z.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
28
55
Break points saved·Even
87
84
Break points won·Dominant
4
32
Deciding sets·Dominant
12
85
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Topo M.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Piros Z.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.2Clay Elo 1399
Surface ELO
7.8+222 Clay Elo edge
2.4Overall Elo 1463
ELO gap
7.6Overall Elo 1661
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
5.0
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Minutes 14d
6.8
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Topo M.Piros Z.
Freshness·Dominant
93
53

Topo M.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Piros Z.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 112 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Choinski J.
Neumayer L.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Choinski J.
Nicod J.
6-46-4
Choinski J.
Nicod J.
6-46-4
Neumayer L.
Molleker R.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Nicod J.
Gakhov I.
6-35-76-2
Choinski J.
Rehberg M.
6-16-1
Nicod J.
Gakhov I.
6-35-76-2
Molleker R.
Paulson A.
6-46-756-3
Neumayer L.
Kym J.[2]
7-56-736-4
R16
Nicod J.
Masur D.
7-686-0
Neumayer L.
Crawford O.[6]
6-46-0
Nicod J.
Masur D.
7-686-0
Choinski J.
Moeller M.
7-626-767-5
Rehberg M.
Mikrut L.
6-03-66-1
Gakhov I.
Topo M.
7-676-2
Paulson A.
Sachko V.
6-17-5
Molleker R.
Royer V.
7-56-4
Kym J.[2]
Krumich M.
6-44-66-1
R32
Nicod J.
Oberleitner N.
6-43-66-4
Royer V.
Rola B.
6-46-2
Nicod J.
Oberleitner N.
6-43-66-4
Choinski J.
Kopriva V.[1]
1-66-36-4
Moeller M.
Safwat M.
6-46-4
Rehberg M.
Nesterov P.
6-34-66-3
Mikrut L.
Jianu F.[7]
4-66-46-3
Topo M.
Piros Z.[4]
6-47-65
Gakhov I.
Schwaerzler J.
6-726-46-3
Masur D.
Novak D.[8]
6-35-76-4
Sachko V.
Misolic F.[5]
6-36-1
Paulson A.
Vrbensky M.
6-44-67-5
Molleker R.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
4-67-646-1
Crawford O.[6]
Giustino L.
7-6102-66-3
Neumayer L.
Kopp S.
6-46-2
Krumich M.
Forejtek J.
7-646-2
Kym J.[2]
Houkes M.
4-66-36-4