Hazem Naw vs Henry Searle — Cassis CH Round of 32

Cassis CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SYR
Hazem Naw
#1065ATP
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 September 2024
hard
GBR
Henry Searle
#273ATP
1540ELO
1419Hard ELO
20 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLWWWWW
Naw H.
7-6 6-3
Searle H.
Naw H.
7762
Searle H.
6230

Hazem Naw defeated Henry Searle 7-6 6-3 in the Cassis CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Hazem Naw closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Naw H.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Searle H.

Searle H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Naw H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Naw H.Searle H.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.5
6.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (47 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Naw H.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Searle H.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.6
Surface form
5.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
3-set count
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Naw H.Searle H.
Freshness·
—
66

Searle H.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 71 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Gasquet R.[3]
Rodionov J.
3-66-16-2
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.
Rocha H.[8]
6-33-66-2
Gasquet R.[3]
Soriano Barrera A.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.
Bertrand R.
6-36-4
Rocha H.[8]
Lokoli L.
6-26-3
Gasquet R.[3]
Droguet T.[5]
6-26-716-3
Soriano Barrera A.
Cilic M.
7-647-5
R16
Droguet T.[5]
Naw H.
6-26-4
Rodionov J.
Lestienne C.[1]
7-56-4
Bertrand R.
Faria J.[7]
3-66-36-2
Lokoli L.
Trungelliti M.[4]
4-66-36-3
Rocha H.[8]
Added D.
4-66-36-3
Gasquet R.[3]
Cornut Chauvinc A.
6-36-3
Cilic M.
Edmund K.
6-27-5
Soriano Barrera A.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-36-4
R32
Trungelliti M.[4]
Marie J.
7-657-62
Rocha H.[8]
Vallejo A.
7-56-3
Soriano Barrera A.
Poullain L.
6-26-3
Naw H.
Searle H.
7-626-3
Lestienne C.[1]
Gueymard Wayenburg S.
7-636-3
Rodionov J.
Malige M.
6-46-4
Bertrand R.
Bourgue M.
6-26-1
Faria J.[7]
Broady L.
7-626-3
Lokoli L.
Guinard M.
7-636-3
Added D.
Salvestre D.
6-26-4
Droguet T.[5]
Gray A.
6-47-5
Cornut Chauvinc A.
Martineau M.
2-66-46-3
Gasquet R.[3]
Bellier A.
7-646-2
Cilic M.
Blanchet U.[6]
6-756-27-64
Edmund K.
Escoffier A.
6-46-1
Bonzi B.[2]
Broom C.
6-37-63