Hamad Medjedovic vs Elias Ymer — Istanbul CH Round of 16

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Hamad Medjedovic
SRB5
Hamad Medjedovic
#69ATP
1841ELO
1744Hard ELO
$736kYTD
$3.0MCAREER
22 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 2 September 2024
hard
Elias Ymer
SWE
Elias Ymer
#183ATP
1548ELO
1527Hard ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
Medjedovic H.
6-4 1-1
Ymer E.
Medjedovic H.
61–
Ymer E.
41–

Hamad Medjedovic advanced when Elias Ymer retired 6-4 1-1 in the Istanbul CH round of 16.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Medjedovic H.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Ymer E.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Medjedovic H.

Serve advantage — Medjedovic H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Medjedovic H.Ymer E.
37
Serve
—
20
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Medjedovic H.Ymer E.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
4.8
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (123 vs 142). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Medjedovic H.Ymer E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
74
48
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
83
Break points won·Clear edge
39
23
Deciding sets·Clear edge
90
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
91
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Medjedovic H.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Ymer E.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.4+217 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Hard Elo 1527
8.1Overall Elo 1841
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1548
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
3.2
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Medjedovic H.Ymer E.
Freshness·Even
100
100

Medjedovic H.: 15 days rest · Ymer E.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Dzumhur D.[1]
Medjedovic H.[5]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[1]
De Jong J.[3]
2-67-57-67
Medjedovic H.[5]
Landaluce M.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Dzumhur D.[1]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-766-14-0
De Jong J.[3]
Simakin I.
6-737-56-3
Medjedovic H.[5]
Dodig M.
6-06-4
Landaluce M.
Moller E.
6-26-4
R16
Moller E.
Geerts M.
7-666-2
Medjedovic H.[5]
Ymer E.
6-41-1
Dzumhur D.[1]
Prizmic D.
6-26-2
De Jong J.[3]
Agafonov E.
4-66-16-4
Dodig M.
Ajdukovic D.[4]
6-33-67-63
Landaluce M.
Purtseladze S.
6-46-3
Pinnington Jones J.
Lock B.
4-66-16-0
Simakin I.
Brouwer G.
6-04-66-3
R32
Simakin I.
Vesely J.
6-16-4
Dzumhur D.[1]
Berankis R.
2-2
Brouwer G.
Yevseyev D.[8]
6-42-1
Pinnington Jones J.
Dougaz A.
4-66-36-0
Geerts M.
Kukushkin M.[2]
4-66-37-5
De Jong J.[3]
Boitan G.
3-66-26-1
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Ramanathan R.
6-46-3
Medjedovic H.[5]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-26-4
Lock B.
Holmgren A.[6]
7-636-1
Purtseladze S.
Damm M.[7]
6-36-1
Agafonov E.
Erel Y.
3-66-37-64
Dodig M.
Duran T.
6-36-4
Landaluce M.
Zhukov M.
6-34-66-4
Moller E.
Kirci K.
6-26-1
Prizmic D.
Ilkel C.
6-726-36-2
Ymer E.
Cretu C.
7-656-4