Omni Kumar vs Vadym Ursu — Shanghai CH Qualifying Round 1

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
USA
Omni Kumar
24 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 September 2024
hard
UKR3
Vadym Ursu
#415ATP
1223ELO
1196Hard ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Kumar O.
6-1 2-6 6-4
Ursu V.
Kumar O.
6262
Ursu V.
1641

Omni Kumar defeated Vadym Ursu 6-1 2-6 6-4 in the Shanghai CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Omni Kumar came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 2–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kumar O.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ursu V.

Ursu V.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Kumar O.

Serve advantage — Kumar O.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kumar O.Ursu V.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
41%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
55%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
55%
54%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
3.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
5.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 66). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kumar O.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ursu V.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
5.2
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
8.4
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kumar O.Ursu V.
Freshness·
—
100

Ursu V.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Rai A.
Kumar O.
1-66-26-3
Noguchi R.[2]
Cui J.[11]
7-676-2
Gombos N.
Gomez F.[1]
6-26-4
Wu T.[4]
Sun F.[8]
6-46-3
Van Wyk K.[12]
Pokorny L.
6-37-5
Mott B.[6]
Donskoy E.[10]
5-76-27-5
Q1
Kumar O.
Ursu V.[3]
6-12-66-4
Rai A.
Uchida K.[9]
2-66-16-4
Gomez F.[1]
Haliak M.
4-66-36-4
Gombos N.
Henning P.
3-66-17-5
Noguchi R.[2]
Basic M.
6-767-56-0
Cui J.[11]
Xiao L.
6-766-20-0
Wu T.[4]
Liu H.
6-46-1
Sun F.[8]
Takahashi Y.
3-66-36-0
Pokorny L.
Lamasine T.[5]
7-676-3
Van Wyk K.[12]
Chen C.
6-46-1
Mott B.[6]
Lu P.
6-06-0
Donskoy E.[10]
Pannu K.
3-67-666-2