Jesper De Jong vs Ilia Simakin — Istanbul CH Quarter-final

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jesper De Jong
NED3
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1607Hard ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 2 September 2024
hard
RUS
Ilia Simakin
#289ATP
1463ELO
1505Hard ELO
22 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLLLL
De Jong J.
6-7 7-5 6-3
Simakin I.
De Jong J.
63762
Simakin I.
77531

Jesper De Jong defeated Ilia Simakin 6-7 7-5 6-3 in the Istanbul CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Simakin I.

Simakin I.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Serve advantage — Simakin I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

De Jong J.Simakin I.
23
Serve
—
17
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Simakin I.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
66%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
65%
Aces / match·Even
6.2
6.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Simakin I.
Clutch Rating·Even
57
58
Break points saved·Even
90
87
Break points won·Slight edge
37
26
Deciding sets·Slight edge
69
79
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
62
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Simakin I.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
4.9+102 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
5.1Hard Elo 1505
5.4Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1463
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
4.0
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.0
Surface transition
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Simakin I.
Freshness·Even
78
82

De Jong J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 25 games (7d) · Simakin I.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Dzumhur D.[1]
Medjedovic H.[5]
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Dzumhur D.[1]
De Jong J.[3]
2-67-57-67
Medjedovic H.[5]
Landaluce M.
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Dzumhur D.[1]
Pinnington Jones J.
6-766-14-0
De Jong J.[3]
Simakin I.
6-737-56-3
Medjedovic H.[5]
Dodig M.
6-06-4
Landaluce M.
Moller E.
6-26-4
R16
Moller E.
Geerts M.
7-666-2
Medjedovic H.[5]
Ymer E.
6-41-1
Dzumhur D.[1]
Prizmic D.
6-26-2
De Jong J.[3]
Agafonov E.
4-66-16-4
Dodig M.
Ajdukovic D.[4]
6-33-67-63
Landaluce M.
Purtseladze S.
6-46-3
Pinnington Jones J.
Lock B.
4-66-16-0
Simakin I.
Brouwer G.
6-04-66-3
R32
Simakin I.
Vesely J.
6-16-4
Dzumhur D.[1]
Berankis R.
2-2
Brouwer G.
Yevseyev D.[8]
6-42-1
Pinnington Jones J.
Dougaz A.
4-66-36-0
Geerts M.
Kukushkin M.[2]
4-66-37-5
De Jong J.[3]
Boitan G.
3-66-26-1
Ajdukovic D.[4]
Ramanathan R.
6-46-3
Medjedovic H.[5]
Pacheco Mendez R.
6-26-4
Lock B.
Holmgren A.[6]
7-636-1
Purtseladze S.
Damm M.[7]
6-36-1
Agafonov E.
Erel Y.
3-66-37-64
Dodig M.
Duran T.
6-36-4
Landaluce M.
Zhukov M.
6-34-66-4
Moller E.
Kirci K.
6-26-1
Prizmic D.
Ilkel C.
6-726-36-2
Ymer E.
Cretu C.
7-656-4